Split Your Amazon Transaction And Use Up That Old Visa Gift Card

5282cd542cdcae43fc13a139Do you have an old prepaid debit card or major credit card-branded gift card sitting around? Maybe it’s sitting around because it has a balance on it that’s too small to be very useful, yet not such a small amount that you’re willing to throw it away. Here’s a novel solution: use it to split a transaction on Amazon.


“But Consumerist!” you say. “Amazon doesn’t let customers split transactions!” No, officially you can’t do that. That’s because there’s a sneaky way to do it: using the card balance to buy an online gift card and e-mailing it to yourself. Reader Dom recently blogged about this concept, and shared it with us in case any of our readers might find it useful during the holiday season.


This is also a useful tip if you’re splitting the cost of an expensive gift. Have one person send the other an e-gift card for half of the cost, then simply apply it to the overall order.


Also, we’d like to point out that the review page for Amazon gift cards makes for some strange and boring reading. 28,376 people have felt the need to express themselves about the experience of buying an Amazon virtual gift card.


How to use a gift card to make partial payment on Amazon.com [Bright Bacon]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Maker Of Wildly Popular Flashlight App Failed To Tell Users It Was Sharing Their Location Info

androidflashlight Most of us have had the bright idea to use our smartphones as flashlights when searching underneath the couch or in the backseat of a dark car. And many millions of people have downloaded flashlight apps that maximize the light coming out of their devices. Most of those people probably never even considered that a flashlight app would be doing anything other than turning on the phone’s lights, and certainly not transmitting location data to third parties.


The Brightest Flashlight Free app for Android has been downloaded at least 50 million times since first becoming available in 2011, and has an impressive 4.8/5 star rating from more than 1 million users. But according to the Federal Trade Commission, the makers of the app deceived consumers by not fully disclosing how the app collected and shared geolocation data.


“While running… the application also transmits, or allows the transmission of, data from the mobile device to various third parties, including advertising

networks,” reads the original FTC complaint [PDF]. “The types of data transmitted include, among other things, the device’s precise geolocation along with persistent device identifiers that can be used to track a user’s location

over time.”


And though the app’s permissions screen does say give it the ability to access the device’s precise location (when GPS is turned on) or approximate location (over the wireless network), the FTC alleges that nothing in the company’s privacy policy or End User License Agreement (EULA) made it clear that this information was being shared with third parties.


The privacy policy for the app states that the developer “may collect, maintain, process and use diagnostic, technical and related information, including but not limited to information about your computer, system and application software, and peripherals, that is gathered periodically to facilitate the provision of software updates, product support and other services to you.”


This policy is restated in the EULA (to which the user must agree). According to the FTC, these statements fail to “adequately disclose to consumers that

the Brightest Flashlight App transmits or allows the transmission of device data, including precise geolocation along with persistent device identifiers, to third parties, including advertising networks.”


What’s more, the FTC claims that whether or not the user accepted the terms of the EULA, the app transmitted location data for the device:



While the “Refuse” button, described in Paragraph 11, appears to give consumers the option to refuse the terms of the Brightest Flashlight EULA, including the terms relating to the collection and use of device data, that choice is illusory. Based upon the statements made in the EULA… consumers would not expect the application to operate on their mobile devices, including collecting and using their device data, until after they have accepted the terms of the EULA. In fact, while consumers are viewing the Brightest Flashlight EULA, the application transmits or causes the transmission of their device data, including the device’s precise geolocation and persistent identifier, even before they accept or refuse the terms of the EULA.



The FTC alleges that failing to disclose the sharing of location info with third parties and the app’s collection and sharing of data regardless of whether the user had agreed to the EULA is deceptive marketing, as this is information that consumers should have been made aware of before installing the app.


“When consumers are given a real, informed choice, they can decide for themselves whether the benefit of a service is worth the information they must share to use it,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “But this flashlight app left them in the dark about how their information was going to be used.”


The app developer has reached a settlement deal [PDF] with the FTC that prohibits them from misrepresenting how consumers’ information is collected and shared and how much control consumers have over the way their information is used. Any personal information collected from users up until this point must also be deleted.


The settlement requires the developer to provide a just-in-time disclosure that fully informs consumers when, how, and why their geolocation information is being collected, used and shared, and will not be able to do so without users’ affirmative express consent.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Man Learns That Spitting On The Sidewalk In Minneapolis Will Earn You A $115 Fine


Suck that saliva back into your cheeks if you’re taking a stroll in Minneapolis, or its sister city St. Paul, for that matter. There’s a law on the books there against spitting in public places, and yes, it’s enforced, as one guy found out recently when he hocked a loogie on the sidewalk.


USA Today [warning: source link has an auto-play video] spoke to a man gobsmacked by the $115 citation he received from cops after spitting on the sidewalk. There he was, just going to get some pizza with his pals when he felt the need to eject saliva from his person. Police gave him the ticket, which comes with a misdemeanor fine for spitting on sidewalks, buses or public areas.


It’s not like he’s going to rage against the machine for punishing his perhaps overly-active salivary glands.


“It’s a little wacky,” he admits. “I mean what can you do though, it’s the law. You’re supposed to obey the law of the land.”


While he knows he might have to spit again some time in the future, he’s not going to let this happen again.


“For spitting I guess i’ll have to bring a bag or something and spit it in it, I don’t know,” he admits.


Sounds like a man with a plan. Or maybe just wait to spit until you’re somewhere acceptable to do so? Either way, model citizen here, folks.


Man fined $115 for spitting on sidewalk [USA Today]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Wendy’s Employee Arrested After Dropping Joint In Customer’s Burger


It’s one thing to get caught smoking marijuana on the job. It’s another to be caught because a customer finds a partially smoked joint in her hamburger.

Police say that’s what happened last month in Lovejoy, GA, where a customer noticed a distinct odor to her drive-thru burger order.


“When she opened it, she discovered a partially smoked marijuana cigarette,” a police lieutenant tells the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.


Not exactly pleased with her unexpected topping, the customer took the burger back to the Wendy’s and complained to the manager, who then contacted the police.


The lieutenant says the employee fessed up when confronted with the tainted food: “She had been smoking while she worked. When she was fixing the burger, part of the marijuana fell into the burger.”


Police charged the 32-year-old employee with possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, and the AJC reports that she has subsequently been fired from her job.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Rustoleum NeverWet More Like “SlightlyLaterWet”

splashA waterproofing treatment that perfectly repels water, turning it into tiny beads that roll off the surface? We’re sure that people could think of many wonderful uses for such an item, from waterproofing hiking boots to covering their roommate’s towel with the stuff. Alas, Rust-Oleum NeverWet isn’t bad, but not quite as advertised.


At least the product’s ads make the way that things are supposed to work look really, really pretty.



Our colleagues over at Consumer Reports put on their (non-waterproof) lab coats and got to work testing. They slathered NeverWet on a variety of surfaces: cloth, wood, plastic, paper, just about every surface possible. (Unlike one tester on YouTube, they did not try to apply it to water.)


The coating does work exactly as advertised, but not for long. It’s more like SoonWet, our sibling publication observed dryly. The coating doesn’t last long, can rub off using only a finger, and doesn’t adhere well to plastic and glass at all.


Claim check: Rustoleum NeverWet [Consumer Reports]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Phone Scammers Tell Woman They Have Her Dad Hostage (Spoiler: They’re Lying)


Phone-based scammers have traditionally employed techniques that either prey upon a victim’s greed — “You’ve won a new car! Just pay the taxes to us now and it’ll be yours” — or protective instincts — “Your grandson is in a hospital in Belarus and needs money ASAP to get treatment” — but these criminals are increasingly using fear to wring cash out of unsuspecting folks.

A few months ago we told you about scammers calling in bogus bomb threats to retail stores, demanding money to not set the (nonexistent) devices off. Now comes the story of a Pennsylvania woman who was conned out of $1,000 by a caller who claimed he was holding her father hostage.


According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, the 23-year-old woman recently received a call on her cellphone.


“We have your dad hostage,” screamed the voice on the other end of the line. “Leave work right now.”


The caller told her that he and her father had been in a car accident, but that her dad had refused to provide insurance information or be cooperative. And so the caller had taken him hostage and claimed to be holding him hostage at gunpoint until he received $1,000 to pay for damage to his vehicle.


“I had to swear that if I wept or cried or got anyone’s attention, they would come to my house and kill my family,” she recalls. “I had to continue to talk to him.”


She was told to leave work and go to a MoneyGram wire transfer location, where she was to send the money to a woman in Puerto Rico. Not knowing what else to do, she followed their instructions.


After the money had been wired, the caller instructed the woman to go to a nearby hospital and circle around the building without parking. He did not make good on his promise to let her speak to her father, and the illusion of the scam came crashing down when the caller said that her dad had driven away in his truck… because he doesn’t own a truck.


“Now I am thinking, this is a scam,” she tells the Inquirer.


And she was right, as her pops had not been in any sort of auto accident or taken hostage. He’d been safely working away at his job, which she would have found out had the scammers not been so successful in keeping her on the line.


Police believe the same caller recently failed at a similar shakedown attempt with another area woman, and say this type of scam has been popping up all over the region, with some 100+ victims up in the Boston area.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Topless Woman Who Chased Peeping Tom Through Kohl’s Is A Hero, A Gosh Darn Hero


When you see something, you should say something. But one woman took that to great, heroic lengths when she noticed a man with his phone under her dressing room door, filming her while she was trying on bras at Kohl’s. She started screaming and chased him through the store — all while topless.

The woman tells KCTV-5 in Kansas City that she saw the man’s hand under the dressing room wall while he lay on the floor, filming her.


She didn’t want him to get away, so instead of just yelling and staying put, she took action — sprinting from the dressing room with her hands covering her breasts as she ran.


“I followed him. I shouted, ‘Stop! Help me!’ I just screamed and chased him topless through the store,” she said. “I know I shouldn’t be chasing someone … I was just enraged. I was at a store in a very private place, and I was enraged and I wanted to get the phone.”


She realized when she hit the front doors of the store that she should probably not take her mad dash outside while half-clothed.


“At that point, I just started crying because I was so upset that he was getting away. When you feel violated, what you really want is for justice to be done,” she says.


Other shoppers had witnessed the chase and helped by going after him outside, and police caught up to the suspect and arrested him three blocks from the store. He’s been charged with breach of privacy, but that’s not enough, explains the victim.


“He is clearly mentally ill, and he clearly needs treatment and he needs to go into the system … so he can get his treatment,” she said.


We salute you, brave lady with no care for her own personal dignity. I’m not sure I could be so courageous in the face of general mortification.


Topless woman sprints through store to help catch peeping Tom [KCTV-5]





by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Boarded-Up But Open Sears Cited For Urban Blight


Rioters destroyed storefronts in downtown Oakland, California five months ago, filling the area with sadness and boarded-up windows. All of the businesses have fixed up their public faces except one. One retailer’s huge building still has boarded-up windows and looks abandoned. Local residents call the blighted storefront “depressing,” and the city issued a citation for “blight.” The blighted business? Sears.

It’s easy to make fun of Sears, and we often do. In this case, the issues are much more complex than just assuming that Sears doesn’t care about its stores. A whole building of broken windows is a bigger problem than a few stained carpets or empty racks here and there.


The real problem is Sears’ legacy. Specifically, that huge building that a very different company called Sears, Roebuck & Co. built in the 1930s. Yes, technically Sears Holdings and Sears Roebuck are the same company, but every American consumer knows that they aren’t really the same company at all.


Oakland Sears still hasn’t repaired windows [San Francisco Chronicle]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Ginormous Hack Targets 2 Million Accounts Spread 93,000 Websites Worldwide


About two million people should be checking your social media accounts and anything else one might have a login and password for: Hackers have snagged usernames and passwords for millions of Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yahoo and other sites accounts, according to a new report.


Researchers at cybersecurity firm Trustwave say the ginormous data breach happened because of keylogging software maliciously installed on a whole lot of computers worldwide, reports CNNMoney.


The malware simply boosted login details for various websites over the past month and had been sending that information to servers controlled by the attackers.


In late November researchers were able to get a lock on the server, which is in the Netherlands. Once they were in they discovered account information for more than 93,000 websites. Yes, 93,000 — that’s a lot more than just Facebook.


Of course social media was a target hit hard by the hackers, with the below numbers showing just how widespread the attack was:


• 318,000 Facebook accounts

• 70,000 Gmail, Google+ and YouTube accounts

• 60,000 Yahoo accounts

• 22,000 Twitter accounts

• 9,000 Odnoklassniki accounts (a Russian social network)

• 8,000 ADP accounts (ADP says it counted 2,400)

• 8,000 LinkedIn accounts


Any company involved in the breach has been notified by Trustwave. So should you be worried about your account? ADP, Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter all said they’ve notified any users affected and reset passwords if their accounts were compromised.


“We don’t have evidence they logged into these accounts, but they probably did,” said John Miller, a security research manager at Trustwave.


The trouble might not be over yet — the hack started Oct. 21 and could still be going, as researchers haven’t been able to track down other similar servers to the one they cracked in the Netherlands.


If you’re still worried run your antivirus software and make sure your security patches are up to date on all your Internet browsers, Adobe and Java.


2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack [CNNMoney]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Notegraphy: Cambiando la forma de escribir en la web





via Educación tecnológica http://villaves56.blogspot.com/2013/12/notegraphy-cambiando-la-forma-de.html www.bscformacion.com