Company Owns Thousands Of Property Liens But No One Knows Who Owns The Company


For the longest time, the tax lien investment business — in which investors buy property tax liens from cities and counties and then collect on the debt (or foreclose on the homeowner) — primarily consisted of small, local investors looking for a relatively quick profit. But in the last two decades, larger companies have taken to buying up as many liens as possible and then shaking down homeowners for the debt and often thousands of dollars in fees. But just because these lien-buyers are bigger and operate in multiple states doesn’t mean they are any more legitimate.

The Washington Post has a fascinating, in-depth look at one Chicago-based company, Aeon Financial, which has purchased thousands of liens in D.C., Maryland, Kentucky, Iowa, and Ohio.


We say “Chicago-based,” but that’s really just where the company’s mailboxes are, reports the Post.


In recent years, Aeon has purchased thousands of liens in various states and in D.C., making a profit by tacking on substantial legal and other fees to the usually small lien amount.


Like one D.C. resident who found out he owed $500 on a condo parking space — not even the condo — after lien notices had mistakenly been sent to the previous owner.


He went to pay the $500 but then found the debt had been sold to Aeon, and the company now wanted $4,200 — more than eight times the original debt — to cover its legal fees.


And thus a 2-year legal battle began, with a judge ultimately deeming the $4,200 bill “excessive” and unnecessary” before knocking it down to $952.


The City Attorney General for D.C. filed suit against Aeon in 2009, claiming it was charging abusively high legal fees to consumers. That case is still pending. Lawyers for the city have been trying to suss out for years who exactly owns the company, but Aeon has repeatedly fought back, asking the court for a protective order to prevent it from being compelled to turn over financial documents that would reveal the ownership.


The best the Post could figure was that a Chicago-based lawyer, Mark Schwartz, is a key figure in the business.


Records from 2004 and 2005 list his sister as the manager of a company named Aeon Properties in Nevada and Maryland. Documents filed in 2011 in Kentucky list Schwartz as a director of Aeon and give his $1.7 million home in Vail, CO, as an address.


Another “owner” of the business is a company called Axis Investment Holdings Trust, which lists the same Chicago office as Aeon, and for which Schwartz is CEO. The office for both of these companies is held in the name of Records Direct, which is a subsidiary of Axis.


The true ownership of a company like Aeon isn’t just a matter of curiosity. On a consumer-facing level, the company’s lack of a place of business, reliable method of contact, and accountability to ownership can result in confusion for those receiving bills and notices from Aeon.


But there are also other legal concerns. For example, the Post points out that Aeon, under fire from officials in Cleveland for allowing foreclosed-upon properties to fall into disarray, managed to unload 83 of those properties in a single day to newly formed LLC. Did Aeon just shuffle these properties to another hand in order to get the city off its back? It’s hard to say without knowing exactly who owns the company.


“This is debt collecting that leads to the destruction of the lower economic level of the community,” said former D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles. “Anyone who would be behind that kind of scheme — and it was a well-thought-out scheme — I don’t think they would be very happy about their names being disclosed on the public record.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

At Least Finding A Pair Of Glasses In Your Jalapeño Poppers Is Way Less Gross Than A Bug

Here at Consumerist, we’ve heard about practically every kind of creepy, crawly, grody thing/creature showing up where it shouldn’t, whether that means spiders in your grapes and bananas or urine in your Taco Bell nachos. But having a pair of spectacles show up in your jalapeño poppers? That could actually be useful.


Useful, perhaps, expected, definitely not. In a post on Reddit that claims “My mom found a pair of glasses in with her Jalapeno Poppers,” we see a cardboard box of poppers with a plastic bag in front of it. And look, inside the plastic, a pair of seeing eye goggles! What is the MEANING OF THIS?


I can see clearly now.

I can see clearly now.



There doesn’t seem to be an explanation, as the poster noted in the comments that the company didn’t seem to be perturbed: “‘Sorry, we’ll send you a coupon’ was the response from the company.”


“Better than ‘Please send them back, Susan can’t read without them,’ ” points out another astute commenter.


And hey, it’s a heck of a lot cheaper than buying prescription specs and frames and all that.


It’s worth pointing out, as of course the Reddit commenters have, that the whole photo could be a sham. Is that bag open? Couldn’t someone just slip the glasses in afterward and claim it came that way? I hope not because I prefer to believe that everything on the Internet is true.




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

NSA Also Spied On World Of Warcraft, Second Life, Xbox Live Users


Because terrorists may be secretly chatting with each other while also trying to level-up their paladins and warlocks, the National Security Agency thought it was a good idea to eavesdrop on online games like World of Warcraft and Second Life, and on gamers who used Xbox Live.

A joint report from the NY Times and ProPublica looks at the latest revelation from the NSA documents leaked by former government contractor Edward Snowden.


The idea is that these games, where players can hide behind characters but still openly communicate and even exchange funds, could be a potential place for terrorists and their supporters to communicate outside of the usual methods.


The apparent threat was so huge that folks from the CIA, FBI and the Dept. of Defense all needed to get in on the action. The documents say that a “deconfliction” group had to be created in order to minimize agents from stepping on each other’s virtual feet in Second Life.


There was also the hope that the agencies could use these online communities to recruit people — drivers for embassies, foreign intelligence agents, etc. — to provide information and access.


And it wasn’t just spies going online to kill orcs and whatnot. The NSA and intelligence officers from the UK were collecting vast amounts of data on users, including communications that took place between gamers.


But for all the work put into spying on gamers and collecting their data, the documents reportedly make little mention of any successful results.


Blizzard, the company that makes World of Warcraft says that any spying done on its users was done without the company’s permission.


“We are unaware of any surveillance taking place,” said a Blizzard rep to the Times. “If it was, it would have been done without our knowledge or permission.”


Just to lighten the mood, let’s just pretend that the great Leeroy Jenkins was actually a top NSA spy gone rogue:




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

The $1 Billion Tragedy: Unredeemed Gift Cards In America


Gift cards can be a truly great gift…to the retail sector. While only 1% of gift cards go unredeemed, with about $116 billion in gift card sales annually, that’s more than $1 billion that we’re just leaving in a drawer until retailers take it back.

When you activate or re-load a gift card, the clock starts ticking. Thanks to 2009′s CARD Act, you have at least five years to spend a gift card after that point. Customers aren’t entitled to a full refund in the event that a company goes out of business. The smaller a company is, the better the odds are that they will disappear: about half of all small businesses close in their first five years.


Size is no guarantee that a company’s doors will stay open, of course: just ask everyone who was stuck with a Borders or KB Toys gift card.


$1 billion in gift cards go unredeemed [Marketwatch]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Judge Tells Baker: You Can’t Sell Wedding Cakes Only To Straight Couples


In a case similar to another wedding cake situation in Oregon, a baker in Colorado who turned a same-sex couple away has been ordered by a judge to serve all couples, straight or gay, or face fines. The judge said that by refusing to accept gay customers, the owner of the bakery was discriminating against them.


In the order from the administrative law judge he writes that the business discriminated against the two men” because of their sexual orientation by refusing to sell them a wedding cake for their same-sex marriage,” reports the Associated Press.


If the bakery wants to be in the wedding cake business, it must “cease and desist from discriminating” against gay couples. Thus far the judge hasn’t levied any fines against the bakery but it’ll face fees if it keeps turning away gay couples.


The American Civil Liberties Union had filed a complaint against shop owner with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission last year on behalf of the two men who had been married in Massachusetts and wanted to have a party in Colorado to celebrate their nuptials. When the owner found out the cake was intended for a gay wedding, the complaint says he turned them away.


The lawyer for the cake shop owner said that this order puts the man in a tough situation.


“He can’t violate his conscience in order to collect a paycheck,” she said. “If Jack can’t make wedding cakes, he can’t continue to support his family. And in order to make wedding cakes, Jack must violate his belief system. That is a reprehensible choice. It is antithetical to everything America stands for.”


The Civil Rights Commission will probably certify the judge’s order next week. In the meantime, the man can appeal the judge’s order.


The couple is “ecstatic,” says one of the men of the judge’s decision, and hopes that it’ll stop similar situations from happening again in the state.


“To a certain extent, though, I don’t think that this is necessarily a surprise,” he said. “We thought it was pretty clear cut that he had discriminated against us.”


Judge orders Colorado cake-maker to serve gay couples [Associated Press]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Sonic Is Really, Really Sorry About That “Scalp The Redskins/Feed Them Whiskey” Sign


Someone at a Missouri Sonic Drive-in chose to express both their support for the Kansas City Chiefs and their utter ignorance by using the restaurant’s sign to post a message that combined nearly every offensive Native American stereotype into one garbled statement.

“‘KC CHIEFS’ WILL SCALP THE REDSKINS FEED THEM WHISKEY SEND – 2 – RESERVATION,” read the sign outside the Sonic in Belton, MO, referencing yesterday’s game between the Chiefs and the Redskins.


After a passerby snapped the above photo and posted it to Twitter, the story took off, with people calling for the sign to be removed and for Sonic to issue an apology.


“The remarks posted on this message board were wrong, offensive and unacceptable,” a rep for Sonic HQ tells NBC News. “In a misguided effort to support his football team an independent franchise owner allowed passion to override good judgment. The owner has reinforced with his employees the boundaries of what is acceptable and unacceptable. On behalf of the franchise owner and our entire brand we apologize for the offensive remarks.”


The rep says that there is an employee at this particular Sonic who has previously had a knack for posting funny message on the sign, but that this was an instance in which his humor apparently crossed the line. He also claims the sign was only posted for “a matter of hours.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Can’t Get Over The Fact That A Guy Fell Asleep On An Airplane And Woke Up Locked Inside Of It

(frankieleon)

You snooze, you lose? (frankieleon)



Okay so just… think about the thing that might be one of your scariest things you think about. Does it involve being locked in a not terribly large space and it’s dark and no one else is there and oh my goodness gracious I’m scared? Take that nightmare and turn it into the reality for a passenger on a recent flight. He fell asleep during a layover and woke up locked inside a dark plane, all by himself.*


The traveler was making his way from Louisiana on a trip to visit family on a United Express flight and had a stop in Houston, reports KRTK.com.


“I was coming from Louisiana to see my sister in California. We had a layover in Texas,” the man explained. “I just took my hat off and I took a nap.”


Because you cannot take a nap in a hat, ladies and gentleman. As all who have tried surely know. Anyway, he took to snoozing and the next thing he knew, he was down the sleep rabbit hole.


“I woke up and the lights were out. I was like, what’s going on? I thought maybe it was a layover, still on the same plane.”


But no — instead he realized he was all by his lonesome, tucked into a window seat near the back of the plane. Somehow no one had noticed his little hideaway and the plane had been turned in for the night.


He thought he was dreaming. It was cold and it was dark in the cabin, but at least his cell phone worked. What did the pioneers do without such technology?


“I called my girlfriend, and she thought I was crazy. I said, ‘Debbie I’m locked on the plane.’ I said, ‘I’m telling you the truth; you better go somewhere and get me off this plane.’”


She realized he wasn’t being a jokester and called the airline. More than half an hour later, the report says, workers hopped on the plane and rescued the marooned adventurer. It sounds like fingers got pointed right away, so far who was at fault for this solo sojourn.


“I said, ‘Don’t put the blame on me. I didn’t do anything wrong here,’” he says. “And then they were, like, try to hush-hush, keep it quiet. And they gave me this little package here in a motel room.”


The man says it’s odd how no one thought to wake him up in Houston, not a staff member, not a passenger, nobody.


“They didn’t sweep the plane,” he said. “I mean, who shut the door?”


Experss jet issued this statement: “An ExpressJet passenger remained on board flight 4245, operating as United Express from Lafayette, La. to Houston on Friday, Dec. 6, after all passengers had deplaned. ExpressJet is investigating to determine how this occurred. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience this caused for the passenger.”


Although the company said a post-flight walk-through happened on that flight, there was no explanation as to how such a thing could’ve missed a large object like a sleeping human being who is not wearing an invisibility cloak or have any other weird, hide-y advantages.


When all was said and done, the man says he was given a voucher and a flight to get to his destination in California as well as a hotel room, after he missed his connection due to the Rip Van Winkle episode. But he still seems crunchy about how everything went down. Understandably so, perhaps?


“What if I had a medical condition or something? What if I had a heart attack and I was dead? You just shut the plane and leave someone on there? It’s the way I look at it,” he said.


Know that this story was only posted because of my loyalty to our readers. Because the whole thing makes me want to jump outside my self and run from all the nearest confined spaces. So, there’s that.


* All byyyyy himseeeeeeelf, don’t wanna be, alllll by himseeeeeelf, anymooooh-oh-ore.


Man falls asleep on flight making connection in Houston; wakes up in dark, empty plane [KTRK.com]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Waitress Who Claimed She Got Anti-Gay Receipt No Longer Employed At Restaurant

The receipt on the left is the version the waitress posted to Facebook, which shows no tip and a note saying the customers disapprove of the waitress' "lifestyle." On the right is a copy of the receipt provided by the customers to NBC News, which they claim shows they left a 18% tip.

The receipt on the left is the version the waitress posted to Facebook, which shows no tip and a note saying the customers disapprove of the waitress’ “lifestyle.” On the right is a copy of the receipt provided by the customers to NBC News, which they claim shows they left a 18% tip.



Yet another development in the tale of the New Jersey waitress who recently claimed that she was stiffed out of a tip by diners’ who disapproved of her being a lesbian. Over the weekend, the restaurant at the center of this story announced that the waitress is no longer an employee there.

In a post on its Facebook page, the restaurant states that “this is not a simple, straight-forward matter and we have conducted our own internal investigation.”


It also calls the results of that investigation “inconclusive as to exactly what happened” but then adds that “in light of the investigation and recent events,” the two parties have made a “joint decision that [the waitress] will no longer continue her employment at our restaurant. We wish her well in the future.”


Oddly enough, this announcement does little to clear up exactly what happened that night. The waitress made headlines around the world when she shared a photo of a receipt leaving her zero tip along with a note that said she was not receiving a gratuity because the customers did not approve of her lifestyle.


This resulted in a widespread outpouring of support. The waitress received thousands of dollars from people who felt she’d been unjustly stiffed on the bill. She stated that she would donate this money to the Wounded Warrior Project.


Then a family came forward — albeit anonymously — to say they were the diners who ate that meal, but that they not only didn’t leave that note on the receipt, they actually tipped $18. To prove their point, the family showed NBC News copies of their receipt and a copy of their credit card statement showing that they had been charged the full amount, including the tip, by the restaurant.


Following this rebuttal from the diners, supposed friends and colleagues of the waitress began speaking to various news outlets, calling into question other claims the waitress had made in the past.


And last week, a rep for Wounded Warrior could not locate any record of a donation from the waitress, causing some to wonder what had happened with the money she had promised to donate.


If the owners of the restaurant wanted to make this issue go away, their statement should have provided more detail. Instead, the vague tone of the announcement only serves to fuel more speculation about what may have actually occurred that evening.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Save Santa: Buy This Hallmark Ornament

santabeaconWhen we received an e-mail from reader Ryan entitled, “The most brilliantly evil Christmas commercial ever made,” well, our interest was piqued. Surely that bar is very high.


“Basically Hallmark threatens Santa to die in a blizzard unless children beg their parents to buy the life saving ornament for $22.95,” Ryan writes. Is that what’s going on here? You be the judge.



In the commercial, Santa’s on someone’s roof, so his life isn’t in danger. The real danger apparently is that he won’t find your house without the ornament to use as a magical beacon. Surely a few people have asked for GPS units and smartphones for Christmas, though. Santa has my permission to tear the boxes of any of my gifts open if it will help him to find my house. I’m cool with that.




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

30 herramientas para flippear tu clase





via Educación tecnológica http://villaves56.blogspot.com/2013/12/30-herramientas-para-flippear-tu-clase.html www.bscformacion.com