Man’s Lawsuit Claims Infected Rodent From Petco Gave Him Rat-Bite Fever


Following a lawsuit earlier this year accusing Petco of selling an infected rat that led to a boy’s death, a Maine man is now suing the chain claiming he got rat-bite fever from a rat he bought at the store.

He filed a federal lawsuit against Petco yesterday, claiming he was bitten twice in March by a rat he bought in February, reports the Portland Press Herald . He then spent 35 days in the hospital battling “multiple spinal abscesses, painful inflammation of his joints, extreme debilitation and pain and suffering,” the lawsuit says


“He could have died,” his attorney said.


The man bought the rat to feed to his son’s pet boa constrictor, something he’s done every two to four weeks. He kept the rat in a tank until he tried to feed it to the snake, which did end up eating its dinner and wasn’t harmed.


So at least the rat didn’t get away with it, eh?


The man says he’s still getting treatments regularly for the disease and that he’s racked up medical bills of more than $170,000. He claims Petco breached its implied warranty and is liable and negligent, and he’s seeking unspecified monetary damages and fees.


Portland man contracted rat-bite fever from Petco rodent, lawsuit says [Portland Press Herald]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

New Jersey Thinks 4G And Wired Broadband Are The Same, Lets Verizon Off The Hook

Fewer New Jersey residents will be seeing vans like this, as the state has let Verizon off the hook for its obligation to provide access to high-speed Internet for all. (photo: SoCal Metro)

Fewer New Jersey residents will be seeing vans like this, as the state has let Verizon off the hook for its obligation to provide access to high-speed Internet for all. (photo: SoCal Metro)



Someone at Verizon is wearing a party hat and celebrating this week, as the telecom titan convinced the state of New Jersey to let it wriggle out of a decades-old obligation to provide broadband throughout the entire Garden State, because apparently 4G wireless broadband is the same as a to-the-home wired connection, and broadband competition is completely unnecessary.

As we mentioned last week, back in 1993, Verizon (then New Jersey Bell) made a deal with the state that lifted some regulations on the industry in exchange for a promise that the company would provide access to high-speed Internet service to 100% of New Jersey residents by 2010.


2010 came and went and a number of rural parts of the state are still living with dial-up or subpar DSL. And even though the original deal was made in the days of modems and CompuServe, its crafters had the foresight to define broadband as 45Mbps, which is actually higher than many Verizon broadband customers receive today.


In 2012, the state’s Board of Public Utilities said Verizon had failed to meet its obligation, spurring the company into launching a bogus grassroots campaign intended to look like New Jersey residents were in support of Verizon using fake e-mails.


In spite of that, and the thousands of legitimate complaints from actual New Jersey residents, the BPU voted unanimously yesterday to approve a deal with Verizon that would let the company off the hook.


According to the Bergen Record, Verizon will no longer be obligated to provide broadband to residents if they have access to broadband service from cable TV providers or wireless 4G service.


That’s right, 4G — which is less dependable and has a per-gigabyte price that is many times that of wired broadband — is apparently an acceptable substitute.


And once again, a governmental agency has helped to reinforce existing broadband monopolies by giving its stamp of approval to the notion that consumers don’t need competition or multiple providers.


Residents who happen to live in areas not served by cable or wireless broadband can petition Verizon for service, but can only get broadband if at least 35 people in a single census tract each agree to sign contracts for a minimum of one year and pay $100 deposits.


In response to the BPU vote, the Verizon computer that churns out laughably lopsided statements to the press went into operation.


“Today’s ruling is great news for the state’s consumers and builds upon the success of Opportunity New Jersey,” reads a company statement that disregards any shred of something known as the truth.


[via DSLreports]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

800,000 Baby Video Monitors Recalled Because Batteries Aren’t Suppose To Burn You

monitor Keeping an eye on your baby while they sleep or play quietly in their room should be a painless task. But for some owners of a recently recalled video monitor the everyday task has left them injured, and in some cases with property damage.


Nearly 800,000 Summer Infant Video Monitors are being recalled because of a potential burn hazard, the Consumer Product Safety Commission reports.


The rechargeable battery in the handheld video monitor can overheat and rupture causing the user to be burned. So far, the company has received 22 reports of overheated or ruptured batteries. In some cases consumers reported smoke and minor property damage.


The two charts below provide specific details on this recall. The first chart provides the letter/number combinations at the beginning of the serial numbers for the problem batteries. The serial number is printed on the back of each battery. The second chart provides the full list of recalled monitor models.


recalledmonitors


Consumers should remove the battery and contact Summer Infant for a replacement battery. In the meantime, the monitor can be used on AC power with the power cord.


The monitors were sold at Babies “R” Us, Walmart, Target, Amazon and other online retailers between February 2010 and 2012.


Summer Infant Expands Recall to Replace Video Monitor Rechargeable Batteries Due to Burn Hazard [Consumer Product Safety Commission]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Elementary School Decides To Stop Giving Kids A Dose Of Mountain Dew Before A Big Test


If I learned anything from spying on my brothers playing Dungeons & Dragons in the basement with their friends, it’s that Mountain Dew is often the preferred fuel of choice for staying awake and making sharp decisions. That being said, a Florida elementary school was getting a heck of a lot of criticism for giving kids a dose of the stuff before taking high-pressure tests.

A grandmother of a child at the school complained to local media about the practice, where the school served students trail mix and about three tablespoons of Mountain Dew before administering the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test each day, reports Florida Today.


That complaint caught the attention of the school district and has raised concerns among parents, among them, the risk of kids crashing from their sugar highs in the middle of the test. It’s also an interesting practice considering state law prevents schools from selling soda.


“Once that was brought to our attention, we eliminated that practice,” a spokesman for the public schools said, adding that they’ve advised the school to only provide water to drink.


The practice goes back 10 years, when the school principal read about it in an education journal.


“She felt that it was a professional practice and implemented it,” the spokeswoman explained. “Since then, there’s been new information (about what’s best for students).”


The principal still seems to think it was a fine idea, as the amount of Mountain Dew administered wasn’t very much, and was part of an overall program of encouraging kids to get ready for the FCAT withh a good night’s sleep and a healthy breakfast.


“We don’t think we were giving them enough to really get into” negative impacts of sugar highs and lows, she said. “We’ve done it for years. The kids look forward to the treats.”


That being said, if parents or others are worried, she can respect those concerns, she added.


Meanwhile, some enterprising fourth grader is probably setting up a black market trade in Mountain Dew.


*Thanks for the tip, Kelly!


School stops serving Mountain Dew before FCAT after complaints [Florida Today]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Do Not Punch Children And Trash The Store When You Can’t Cash In Your Change Jar

sparechangeWe’ve all been there: you’re out of cash for some reason, and have to raid your change jar for spending money. While it can be difficult to find a place to trade that money in fee-free, we do not recommend the method that a woman in Florida used.


She tried to get a convenience store clerk to trade her coin jar for cash. Well, it doesn’t hurt to ask, does it? Her request wasn’t all that reasonable, and neither was her next move, knocking items over inside the store. As her brawl with the store owner moved outside, the owner claims that the woman spewed ethnic slurs and death threats at him.


Then she threw a punch. Instead of hitting the store owner, the punch handed on a seven-year-old girl who was sitting outside at a picnic table. She has a bruise on her face, and is also experiencing nightmares.


This whole mess could have been avoided if she were willing to use a Coinstar machine and get a fee-free Amazon gift certificate or something. Maybe that could be a new advertising slogan. “Coinstar: preventing children from getting punched in the face by people in a coin-induced rage.” Not very catchy.


Angry customer trashes store, throws punch [News 13]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Proposed Regulations On E-Cigarettes Include Health Warning Label, Age Restrictions

ecig It only took five years, but the Food and Drug Administration is ready to begin regulating electronic cigarettes. While the new rule covers a lot of ground with the never-before regulated devices, it doesn’t deal with some of critics’ more controversial concerns.


The FDA’s first step in regulating the popular alternative to traditional cigarettes includes banning the sales to minors and requiring manufactures to put health warnings on the devices.


“Tobacco remains the leading cause of death and disease in this country. This is an important moment for consumer protection and a significant proposal that if finalized as written would bring FDA oversight to many new tobacco products,” FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, says in a news release.


However, the proposed regulations fail to address one of the products most controversial qualities – the use of flavorings. Opponents of the products contend that the flavorings, such as strawberry or chocolate, are used to attract teenagers. Additionally, the regulation does not include restrictions on television advertisements.


Officials with the FDA say the regulations provide a framework for additional rules in the future, which could include restrictions on flavorings pending the results of scientific research.


Mitchell Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products says the new restrictions are a “significant step in the agency’s ability to regulate tobacco products.”


“I call the market for e-cigarettes the wild, wild West in the absence of regulations,” he tells the Los Angeles Times.


Warning labels required under the new regulations would warn consumers against the danger of becoming addicted to nicotine.


The new regulations, which also impose restrictions on nicotine gels and pipe tobacco, require manufacturers to register their products with the FDA within two years. In the meantime, companies could continue to sell new and existing devices without FDA approval.


Before the regulations could become legal they must go through a public comment process and prevail over potential legal challenges before coming into effect.


The FDA has come under fire from consumer advocates and political figures for their slow progress in regulating the e-cigarette industry. Earlier this month, senators at a Congressional budget hearing told FDA Commissioner Hamburg that the agency’s failure to issue regulations was unacceptable.


In 2009, the FDA sought to impose restrictions on the devices, which it described at the time to be medical devices designed to deliver nicotine, but a federal court struck down that attempt. The following year, the agency declared it had the power to regulate the devices under its authority to regulate tobacco products.


E-cigarettes, and their potential health-risks, have been at the center of heated debate between supports and opponents of the devices.


Companies who manufacture the devices believe they should be exempt from FDA regulations, contending it would stifle innovation, damage small business and hurt consumer trying to quit smoking.


Still, there is no clear data on the health impact associated with the devices. Supporters contend that the devices help consumers stop smoking traditional cigarettes, while opponents argue the devices are attractive to teenagers and secondary risks, such as poisoning and a tendency for the devices to explode, could be more deadly than traditional cigarettes.


Last month, the New York Times explored one of the deadliest attributes e-cigarettes pose: liquid nicotine. When ingested or absorbed even small amounts of the toxin could prove deadly.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a new report [PDF] earlier this month that show the number of calls to poison centers involving e-cigarette liquid containing nicotine rose from one per month in September 2010 to 215 per month in February 2014.


The popularity of e-cigarettes grown immensely in recent years, with sales of the devices reached more than $1.5 billion in 2012, the LA Times reports.


But even as more consumers use the devices, some cities have banned the products from being used in public places, such as parks or on the subway.


FDA proposes to extend its tobacco authority to additional tobacco products, including e-cigarettes [Food and Drug Administration]

FDA to begin regulating e-cigarettes [Los Angeles Times]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Taco Bell To Break From Its Authentic Mexican Roots With New American-Inspired Taco Joint

ustaco As everyone knows, Taco Bell’s deeply authentic Mexican roots go back to the company’s humble beginnings in 1843 as Taco Campana, a family business selling flatbreads and food to hungry travelers outside of Hermosilo. For more than 150 years, the Bell has been a leader in bringing the finest in Mexican cuisine — from the Meximelt to the Chipotle Ranch Chicken Loaded Griller to the Crunchwrap Supreme — to U.S. diners aching for the exotic flavors one can only find south of the border. So it’s surprising that the company has announced a new initiative to create a chain serving “American-inspired” tacos… and booze.


The O.C. Register reports that Taco Bell is launching a test eatery called, cleverly enough, U.S. Taco this summer in Huntington Beach, CA.


The name is even more literal than it may sound, as the restaurant won’t just be serving American-style tacos, but tacos actually inspired by regional American foods.


So there would be a lobster roll taco to represent New England, a brisket taco repping Texas BBQ, etc.


“Taco Bell is Mexican-inspired, and U.S. Taco is American-inspired,” explained Taco Bell’s Curiously Australian CEO Greg Creed, who told the Register that this new venture won’t be selling things like burritos and tortilla chips.


The new place will also try to distance itself from the Bell and from competitor Chipotle by serving booze. Though the pilot location has hit a speed bump in getting its alcohol permit and probably won’t serve alcohol, the company says that future U.S. Taco locations would serve more than 50 types of draft and bottled craft beer, along with booze-infused shakes.


[via Eater]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Google Street View Now Goes Back In Time All The Way To Ye Olden Days Of 2007

The Freedom Tower in NYC, then and now.

The Freedom Tower in NYC, then and now.



Ah, those misty, water-colored memories of the time way back in 2007, when we had a different guy in the White House and the word “selfie” wasn’t the bane of social conversations yet. If you’ve got a hankering for days gone by, Google’s updated Street View imagery can take you back in time — only so far as seven years though, so don’t go looking for your childhood treehouse to suddenly appear on the map.

In a new feature for its desktop maps announced on its blog yesterday, Google’s Street View imagery will now allow users to check out historical imagery from past collections, in essence creating something like a “digital time capsule of the world,” as Google calls it.


For example, here’s the construction over the years of New York City’s Freedom Tower, or on a more somber note, you can view how natural disasters have wreaked havoc on landmarks in places like Japan after the 2011 earthquake, and how those spots are recovering now.


Again, you won’t be able to go back and make sure your parents kiss a the Under the Sea dance in order to preserve your own existence, because Google didn’t have a Street View car at that time anyway, but it could be pretty neat to see how all the old, interesting spots in your town have turned into a Starbucks. Or depressing, really. Either way, time travel!




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Dunkin’ Donuts Profits Hurt By Crappy Weather, Moves Up California Store Opening


When the Northeast experienced exceedingly nasty winter weather earlier this year, do you know what people didn’t do? They didn’t venture out of their houses for hot coffee, apparently. Dunkin’ Donuts announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2014, and they blame the crappy weather for profits that are $800,000 lower than last quarter.

Keeping that in mind, it’s exciting news that the chain’s first shop in California will open sometime before the end of this calendar year, and not sometime in 2015, as they originally announced more than a year ago.


You know what would really help sales when hot weather hits, Dunkin’ Donuts? Doughnut ice cream sundaes. Maybe consider it.


Dunkin’ says harsh winter cut hole in earnings [MarketWatch]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

McDonald’s Is Sending Ronald McDonald To Work On Twitter In A New Outfit

ronnymcdonnynew Let there be no doubt about it — just because there’s some “taco shop” out there using guys named Ronald McDonald to talk breakfast smack, the true Ronny McDonny has only one master and that is McDonald’s. The chain is dusting off the 51-year-old Ronald McDonald character, giving him a new outfit and sending him out to spread the chain’s message on social media.


In a move that reminds me of taking your divorced uncle shopping and teaching him how to use the Twitter before he re-enters the dating world, McDonald’s had a designer redo Ronald’s entire outfit in an effort to make him more modern, and will employ #RonaldMcDonald across social media channels, the company said in a press release yesterday.


Clad in yellow cargo pants and a vest with a red-and-white striped rugby shirt, and on special occasions, a “whimsical new red blazer” and special bow tie, Ronald has come a long way from his yellow jumpsuit days, and he’ll be expected to work that new look all over new commercials and promotional materials for restaurants.


“Ronald brings to life the fun of our brand by connecting with customers around the world, whether he’s promoting literacy or spreading cheer at a Ronald McDonald House,” said Dean Barrett, Senior Vice President, Global Relationship Officer in the press release. “Customers today want to engage with brands in different ways and Ronald will continue to evolve to be modern and relevant.”


No word yet on whether Ronald will be trusted with his own Twitter account, but for now his no doubt profound utterances will be featured on the company’s @McDonaldsCorp account. I hope there’s at least one “What is this thing” tweet on his behalf. It’s only fitting.




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist