Maker Of Processed Meat Products To Purchase Maker Of Muscle Milk, Other Supplements


Hormel Foods Brands added to its already diverse portfolio by making a move to purchase CytoSport Holdings, the maker of supplement brands such as Muscle Milk.

Minnesota-based Hormel announced that it will pay $450 million for California-based CytoSport.


Officials with Hormel, which produces brands such as Dinty Moore meals, Skippy peanut butter, Hormel Chili and DiLusso deli meats, say the deal should close within 30 days.


Hormel board chairman Jeffery Ettinger says in a news release that the addition of CytoSport aligns with the company’s focus on protein.


CytoSport specializes in a variety of dietary supplements that are designed to provide muscle mass for body builders and other athletes.


Hormel Foods to Acquire Maker of Muscle Milk® Sports Nutrition Products [Hormel Foods]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Direct Mail Companies To Pay $25 Million For Misleading Donors About Veterans’ Charity Fundraiser


Donating to a worthy cause can provide a sense of doing something good for others, but as we’ve warned before, there’s a chance the money you’re donating isn’t making it to the actual charity. And, unfortunately, that shady tactic appears to be the case for two companies that sent solicitations on behalf of a veterans’ charity.

The New York Attorney General’s Office announced that its Charities Bureau’s investigation into alleged direct mail fundraising abuses resulted in a $24.6 million settlement with two companies that sent misleading mailings on behalf of the Disabled Veterans National Foundation (DVNF).


Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called the alleged abuses “some of the most troublesome features” of direct mail fundraising.


The two direct-mail companies, Quadriga Art and Convergence Direct Mailing, sent fundraising appeals for the charity and raised more than $116 million, Schneiderman’s office said.


The mailings allegedly included material that was false or misleading, such as stories about veterans the charity hadn’t helped. In other instances, the mailings claimed that for every dollar donated, the DVNF would be able to deliver $10 in goods and services to disabled veterans, when in reality over 90 cents of every dollar went to cover DVNF’s direct mail costs.


Under the settlement, Quadriga, which produced and sent out the mailing and played the dominant role in running DVNF’s fundraising efforts, will pay $9.7 million in damages for its alleged abuses and forgive DVNF the $13.8 million it owes the company. Quadriga will also pay an additional $800,000 to the state of New York for costs and fees.


The second company, Convergence, which designed the solicitations and provide other advice for DVNF, will pay $300,000 in damages.


The $9.7 million penalty to Quadriga and the $300,000 from Convergence will be combined into a $10 million fund to help support and improve the lives of disabled American veterans.


The AG’s investigation found that Quadriga allegedly took advantage of DVNF board’s lack of fundraising experience to sign the charity up for a “funded model” direct mail solicitation campaign far larger in scale than the board imagined.


The model stipulated that the fundraiser assumes the up-front printing, packaging and mailing costs of the direct mail campaign, and is paid only out of the revenues brought in by the campaign. In exchange, the fundraiser obtains effective control over the charity’s donated revenues, as well as a lien on the charity’s donor list.


The investigation found that DVNF’s board was not fully aware of the scope of the arrangement, and did not ask about many critical elements of the campaign. Additionally, it was discovered that several conflicts of interest were present between DVFN and the two companies.


Both companies must adopt a number of significant reforms to improve transparency and set a higher ethical bar for the direct mail charitable solicitations industry.


For its part DVNF is required to reorganize its board, including replacing all of its founding directors. It must appoint a committee to re-examine its business model and terminate its relationship with Quadriga and Convergence.


A.G. Schneiderman Announces $25 Million Settlement With National Veterans Charity And Its Direct Mail Fundraisers [New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Feds Warn Consumers Against Taking Pension Advances


Unfortunately, not everyone currently in retirement has enough cash on hand to stay afloat, even those fortunate enough to receive a pension from their former employer. That’s why it might be tempting to solve a short-term money problem by taking out a pension advance, which pays you a lump sum now for signing over your pension payments to the lender for anywhere from a few years to a decade. Today, the Federal Trade Commission warned consumers to think twice before agreeing to one of these loans.

In a standard loan, you’re making a deal with the lender to get money now with the promise of gradually paying it back, plus interest. With a pension advance loan, cautions the FTC, you’re giving the lender the income you will need to live on for the longterm. And, of course, the amount you receive in the lump sum is less than the total amount you would have earned from the pension over the long haul.


Additionally, the FTC warns that these advance loans often come with substantial fees that effectively push the interest rate past 100%, drastically sapping value from the loan.


And then there’s the requirement on some pension advance loans that you take out a life insurance policy, naming the lender as the beneficiary. While this insures that the debt will be repaid if something happens to you, it also means more money out of your pocket every month.


The FTC recommends that anyone considering a pension advance loan ask the following questions before agreeing to one:


• Are you eligible? Not all pensions are eligible to be signed over to another party, and in some cases it may be illegal. Check with your pension administrator for details.


• What are the costs? Not all lenders are transparent in their marketing, or even in their contracts, about the actual APR for their pension advance loans. Be sure to ask the lender for the full APR, which is based on several things, including the amount you borrow, the interest rate and credit costs you’re being charged, and the length of your contract. Also ask in advance if there are any additional costs or fees, including commissions and life insurance.


• Do you have to buy life insurance? Being required to add a life insurance policy can tack on quite a bit of money to the total cost for your advance loan. Every dollar spent on insurance is another dollar of value drained from the advance.


• What are the tax implications? That wad of cash you get from the lender in exchange for access to your pension could push you into a higher tax bracket. Again, this means that you’re getting less value out of the advance.


• Can you cancel the transaction? Not all pension advance companies let you cancel once you’ve completed the deal. Make sure you ask the company about its cancellation policy, before you sign the contract.


• Are there complaints about the company? The FTC advises you check with your local consumer protection agency, your state Attorney General’s Office, and the Better Business Bureau to find out if any complaints have been lodged against the company offering the advance.


Rather than risk your retirement income on an advance loan, the FTC recommends talking to a local credit union about a loan. At the very least, do some comparison shopping of all available pension advances in order to find the one that is the most beneficial.


If you’re in debt, talk to your creditors to see if you can make payment arrangements that will not require you to take out an advance against your pension.


The FTC also offers advice on finding a non-profit consumer credit counseling service if you need help working out a debt repayment plan with creditors or developing a budget.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Regulators Open Investigation Into Dodge Ram Because Locking Wheels Are A Cause For Concern


For the second time in as many months the Dodge Ram is at the center of a probe by U.S. regulators. This time an issue with the truck’s fastener can cause the rear axle to lock or detach, and in some cases cause the vehicle to enter an uncontrolled spin.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a preliminary investigation into more than 260,000 model year 2005 Dodge Ram 1500 after receiving 15 consumer complaints on the issue.


According to NHTSA’s notice [PDF] the rear differential locked up or the driveshaft separated at the rear connection.


Consumers reported there was little or no noise or other warnings prior to the lock-up and/or separation.


Of the 15 reports, seven occurred at speeds of 50 miles per hour or greater, and two allege that the rear axle lockup caused the truck to go into a spin.



“While driving on interstate 195, I entered exit lane 28A and without warning at 60MPH my rear tires locked up, the driveshaft disconnected from rear and my truck went into an uncontrolled spin.”



The preliminary evaluation seeks to assess the scope, frequency and safety-related consequences of the alleged defect.




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Southwest’s International Flights Start Taking Off Today To Caribbean Destinations


Until now, Southwest Airlines has had its wings spread exclusively over American soil. But starting today, the carrier will start flying outside of the country, adding flights to the Caribbean first and other international destinations later this summer and into the fall.


Southwest had been planning to take over the routes of its new subsidiary, AirTran Airways, so this expansion has been expected.


Starting today, Southwest will fly routes to the Bahamas, Aruba and Jamaica, leaving out of Atlanta, Baltimore, Orlando, Boston and Pittsburgh, reports the Los Angeles Times.


On Aug. 10, it’ll add flights to Cancun and Los Cabos, Mexico as well as Mexico City and Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic on Nov. 2.


Passengers can check two bags free of charge on those flights, but be sure you check Southwest’s restrictions for size and weight, as they may be different than its domestic flight rules.


The plan eventually is for Southwest to serve 96 destinations in six countries, including all of AirTran’s current international routes.


As for why it took this long for the airline to get into the global game, it had to train crews and install new equipment on some planes, as many didn’t have the flotation devices in passengers seats required by federal law for any planes that fly long distances over water.


Southwest Airlines begins international service to Caribbean [Los Angeles Times]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Bank Closes Temporarily After Customer Calmly Leaves A Few Steaming Deposits On The Floor

Not the floor in question. (okbeatnik)

Not the floor in question. (okbeatnik)



A branch of Barclays bank in the U.K. had to shut down temporarily yesterday, after a customer walked in and reportedly made a few stinky deposits. Fine, I won’t dance around it: He pooped. On the floor. Multiple times.

An eyewitness tells the Daily Star that a middle-aged man who appeared “well-to-do” and “calm but angry” simply walked into the branch and started doing his bathroom business from the bottom of his shorts, while customers watched in horror.


So was it a protest against the deplorable state of banking around the world today, was he striking a blow for all the disenfranchised consumers out there? We may never know.


“He didn’t say anything at all, but you can tell from his face he looked angry,” the witness explains. “I wasn’t really paying attention until I noticed a foul, but unmistakable smell.”


He claims the man even went up and down the stairs to make sure he made a mess, going about on his rounds and defecating.


“I looked at the guy and he was just calmly walking around the bank – going to all the areas he could,” the witness said. “And then as calmly as he walked in he left.” He did add that the man “looked smug” as he exited the building.


Staff was flabbergasted, the spectator reports, and “the stench was unreal.”


Customers were asked to leave while the staff cleaned up the mess.


Thus far, Barclays hasn’t commented on the incident.


That’s the wrong kind of deposit! Barclays bank customer POOS all over the floor [The Daily Star]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Driver Sues Police For Making Her Remove Bumper Sticker, Violating Her Constitutional Rights


It’s nothing new for drivers to poke fun at the police, but two Indianapolis police officers weren’t in a joking mood when they pulled over a driver with a bumper sticker reading “unmarked police car” taped in her back window and made her remove it. She’s now suing, claiming her First Amendment rights to free speech were violated.

The woman was driving her silver minivan to work one day when officers pulled her over inside a parking garage, and said she’d have to remove the sticker, reports the IndyStar.com.


“The officer asked her, ‘Is this your vehicle?’ and asked for her license and registration,” the woman’s lawyer, of the American Civil Liberties Union said. “And then he said, ‘With that bumper sticker, someone could think you’re impersonating a police officer.’”


The attorney said he also suggested someone who dislikes cops might try to shoot at her.


“It’s a joke — it’s ironic,” her attorney said of the bumper sticker. “It’s like you or I wearing a T-shirt that says, ‘Undercover cop.’”


She did what the cops told her, and was free to go after she did. She was nervous and intimidated, she says, so she didn’t try to argue. She says her coworkers later suggested she call the ACLU, which she did the next day.


The ACLU claims in the civil lawsuit that the two officers violated her constitutional right to free speech as well as Fourth Amendment rights “by their unreasonable detention and interrogation.”


She’s seeking unspecified damages and legal costs. The suit also asks for an injunction requiring “defendants to cease and desist from further suspicionless detention, interrogation, harassment, and intimidation related to the humorous content of bumper stickers.”


And also, about that sticker?


“[The plaintiff] has not put the bumper sticker back on her minivan but wishes to do so.”


The city of Indianapolis responded to the lawsuit, saying in a statement from corporation counsel, “We take every lawsuit against the city extremely seriously.”


No joke: Driver sues IMPD officers over her bumper sticker [IndyStar.com]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

State Says Man Doesn’t Have To Repay $17K, Will Keep Billing Him For It Anyway


They say that some mistakes you make will haunt you the rest of your life (like that ZIMA logo tattoo on the small of my back). They should add that mistakes made by the state of New Jersey will also apparently cling to you like stink on a skunk. Just ask the man who has watched a $17,000 error by the Garden State bloom into a $21,000 problem that now involves South Carolina… and which will never, ever go away.

We first told you about the unlucky fellow in the spring of 2013, when he was being chased by the NJ Dept. of Labor for $17,000 in unemployment benefits it claimed he owed.


A quick recap: Back in 2007, the man lost his job in New Jersey and filed for unemployment. A few months later, he and his family relocated to South Carolina. He contacted the state to ask what should be done about his unemployment and was told to keep filing with New Jersey.


As you probably recall, jobs weren’t exactly easy to come by in 2008 so the man took what he could get, occasional part-time work at Lowe’s, sometimes only 10 hours a week. Again, he checked with the folks in NJ and they said to keep filing there to claim for the hours he wasn’t working every week.


This went on until 2010 when his benefits dried up. Only at that point did someone in NJ mention that he should have filed in South Carolina once he’d crossed a certain income threshold that would have taken him off the NJ unemployment logs and onto the ones in his new state.


Not long after being told this, the state of NJ was demanding he repay $17,000 in unemployment benefits to the state that had given him incorrect information for more than two years.


With some help from the Newark Star-Ledger’s Bamboozled column — penned by Consumerist’s Karin Price Mueller — the state finally admitted that the man had done everything he’d been told to do and it was an “agency error.” Thus, he would not have to repay the $17,000.


End of story, right? Not by a long shot.


In a new Bamboozled story, the man says he had a couple of months of peace before the crud-storm started up again.


Last summer, the state of South Carolina called him in, told him he needed to fill in some paperwork.


“They said New Jersey asked them to have me apply for benefits for the years in question, years later,” he tells Bamboozled. “I felt funny doing this but I didn’t want to rock the boat.”


The folks at the unemployment office didn’t really have an explanation for the paperwork, saying they were just doing what they’d been asked by New Jersey officials to do.


It took about nine months, but the ghost of New Jersey returned angrier than ever this past spring, when South Carolina dropped a $21,000 bill on this unlucky fellow.


The state also sent him a $200 check that he’s never cashed for fear of the unholy ghouls that would be unleashed.


Shortly after the $21,000 notice from South Carolina came yet another payment demand from NJ for the original $17,000.


South Carolina eventually explained to the man that the $21k bill was actually being sent on behalf of NJ, as South Carolina doesn’t bill consumers for overpayment of benefits; it garnishes their wages and benefits to recoup that money.


Then came yet another notice from NJ, this time demanding $15,931 in repayment.


When contacted by Bamboozled, a rep for the NJ Dept. of Labor basically said there is nothing that can be done about these bills, even though the state openly admits it screwed up and the man doesn’t owe the money.


“In such cases, an individual may continue to receive notices of the debt, which does not disappear,” explained the rep, presumably between performances in the Paramus Park Playhouse production of No Exit.


The rep says that the notices are probably the result of newer fraud detection initiatives intended to recoup lost money for states and the federal government. Since the debt isn’t being pursued but hasn’t been wiped off the books, some a-hole computer somewhere sees his $17,000 as low-hanging fruit to be collected.


And it will likely continue to be that way; not just with notices but with his tax returns. It’s possible — but not definite — that any future tax refund could be wiped out by an automated collection of this not-a-debt.


“I can’t understand for the life of me why they can’t turn off the spigot if they decided it’s an agency error,” said the man, who has a new job of rolling the same huge rock up the same huge hill every morning. “It’s an uneasy feeling but I’m going to look at this as a closed chapter.”


Bamboozled: $17,000 unemployment mix-up will haunt man forever, state says [NJ.com]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Graco Recalls Harness Buckles On 1.9 Million Infant Car Seats

Graco instructions for replacing buckles. (Graco)

Graco instructions for replacing buckles. (Graco)



It’s not a great week for Graco: Hot on the heels of Consumer Reports’ announcement that one of its strollers is a safety risk, the company says it’s recalling the harness buckles on 1.9 million infant car seats, due to difficulty opening the buckle.

After an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Graco says it will provide a free replacement buckle to those car seats affected, which were manufactured between July 2010 and May 2013.


Don’t know if your car seat’s buckle is part of the recall? You can check its model name and manufacture date on Graco’s recall site.


There have been no reported injuries associated with the funky buckles, but Graco is encouraging consumers to order a buckle replacement kit and install the new piece as soon as it arrives. According to Graco, the seats can still be used safely while waiting for replacement buckles.


“As the industry leader in baby and parenting essentials, the decisions we make about product safety are far-reaching. We take this responsibility seriously,” said Laurel Hurd, President of Graco Children’s Products. “Both NHTSA and Graco investigated consumer concerns in an effort to address the issues with the buckles used on certain infant car seats. We are pleased to announce a solution that we believe is in the best interest of consumers and underscores our shared commitment to child passenger safety.”




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

McDonald’s Service Complaints End In Two OWI Arrests In One Day


We’re not sure if a Wisconsin McDonald’s restaurant truly has terrible service standards or if it’s just a hotbed for drunk men.

According to the Janesville Gazette, two customers were arrested for operating while intoxicated in two separate incidents in the same day at the fast food joint.


The first incident occurred at around 7:25 a.m. on Sunday when a 35-year-old man returned to the restaurant because he was upset.


Local police officials say the man was complaining because his big breakfast was missing its pancakes.


Employees called the police, who then determined the man was intoxicated and noted he had a passenger with open intoxicants. The man was arrested on a charge of intoxicated driving.


The second incident occurred nearly 17 hours later, just after midnight, when a 25-year-old man allegedly told employees he was glad they called police so he cold complain about their service.


When police arrived, the man was still in his car in the drive-thru. Police officials say he told them that employees would not serve him. He was then arrested for an OWI charge.


Wisconsin men return to McDonalds to complain, arrested for OWI [The Janesville Gazette]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist