FAA Halts US Flights Over Iraq Because Of Ongoing “Hazardous” Conflict


For the second time in two months, the Federal Aviation Administration has banned U.S. airlines from flying over international areas of conflict; this time over Iraq.

The FAA issued a notice today restricting U.S. operators from flying in the airspace above Iraq because of the armed conflict in the area.


The restriction applies to all U.S. air carriers and commercial operators and those exercising privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA.


CNBC reports that the restriction is related to continued fighting between militants associated with ISIS and Iraqi security forces and their allies.


“Due to the potentially hazardous situation created by the armed conflict between militants associated with the Islamic-state in Iraq and the levant and Iraqi security forces and their allies, all flight operations in the Baghdad flight information region..are prohibited until further advised.”


The Pentagon confirmed to CNBC that the U.S. had conducted an airstrike against the Islamic insurgents in Iraq on Friday.


In late July, the FAA halted all U.S. flights to Israel for a 24-hour period because of missile concerns.


FAA restricts US operator flights over Iraq [CNBC]

Press Release – FAA Statement–New Notice to Airmen Issued for Iraq [Federal Aviation Administration]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Consumerist Friday Flickr Finds

Here are twelve of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last week, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.














Our Flickr Pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Want to see your pictures on our site? Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

1-In-3 Americans Still Feeling The Sting Of Recession

chart1 While many Americans are now doing better than they were during the Great Recession, those dark days took such a toll on many consumers’ savings that some people who are currently doing well enough to pay the bills and enjoy a decent living aren’t able to make necessary longterm investments, like buying a new home or saving for retirement.


This is according to newly released survey results [PDF] from the Federal Reserve.


As you can see from the above chart, 34% of those surveyed said they are in the same financial situation as they were five years earlier. Another 30% are at least somewhat better than they were, but then there is the 34% who claim to be worse off now.


These numbers seem to match up with another question asked by Fed surveyors, with 23% of respondents saying they were “living comfortably,” and 37% reporting they were “doing okay,” adding up to 60% of Americans feeling they were in a stable place. But 25% say they are “just getting by” financially, and 13% admit they are “finding it difficult to get by.”


Even with the majority of Americans feeling they are in an okay place with their finances, a large number of them now lack savings or are unable to make necessary investments.


According to the survey, 42% of Americans delayed a major purchase or expense directly due to the recession, and 18% put off what they considered to be a major life decision.


rainy


Nearly 60% of all respondents lack a “rainy day” fund that could cover three months of expenses if needed. The percentage of unprepared consumers actually increases with age (up until age 60 and above).


Additionally, only about half of the people surveyed by the Fed can cover a hypothetical emergency expense costing $400 without selling something or borrowing money.


retirement


It’s probably not a shock that 41% of people between 18-29 aren’t thinking about planning their retirement finances, but nearly 1-in-5 people between the ages of 45-59 are giving no thought at all to saving for retirement. When you add in the 20% who are only giving it a little thought, that means that 40% of people approaching retirement age are, at best, giving it only cursory consideration.


In terms of the housing market, there is tempered optimism among consumers, with most current homeowners believing that the value of their property will increase in the coming year. However, 45% of homeowners still believe their house is worth less than it was in 2008 when the housing market collapsed, so for these consumers the hoped-for value increase is more about getting back to a previous level.


The longterm implications of the recession on the housing market can be seen in renters’ response to the survey questions.


Most renters would rather own a home, especially in the younger age groups of 18-29 and 30-44, where only 14% of respondents say they prefer renting to owning a home.


However, these same groups say they can’t buy a home. In fact, nearly half of all renters say the biggest roadblock to buying a home is the inability to pay the hefty down-payment. Given that many markets only require 5-10% of a home’s value (plus mortgage insurance), this seems to indicate a serious lack of savings.


Interestingly, the age group that most frequently cited an inability to qualify for a mortgage as an impediment to homeownership are those renters between 45-59, perhaps indicating that this group includes a number of people whose creditworthiness was damaged during the recession.


“In general, it appears that the majority of the population is making progress in recovering from any effects the financial crisis had on their personal finances and household’s financial well-being,” concludes the survey. “However, despite these overall reasons for optimism about the economic conditions of U.S. households, the findings in this survey highlight that economic challenges remain for a significant portion of the population.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Hyundai Fined $17.35M For Failing To Issue Brake Recall For More Than A Year


If we’ve learned anything this year it’s that vehicle recalls are a big deal, and, as a car manufacturer, ignoring signs of a recall will most certainly land you in hot water with U.S. regulators. And so, Hyundai will pay more than $17 million for delaying a recall related to defective brakes.


The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced that Hyundai agreed to pay a $17.35 million fine for putting off a recall that affected more than 27,000 cars in 2012, The Associated Press reports.


According to investigators, Hyundai became aware in early 2012 that brake fluids used in the model year 2009 to 2012 Hyundai Genesis did not sufficiently inhibit corrosion in key components of the vehicle’s brake system which could result in reduced braking effectiveness and increase the risk of a crash.


Instead of issuing a recall immediately, the manufacturer asked dealers to change the brake fluid in affected vehicles, but offered no explanation about the consequences that failure to actually repair the issue could cause. Additionally, owners of Genesis vehicles were not notified about the issue, NHTSA reports.


Hyundai finally issued a recall [PDF] of 27,500 Genesis vehicles in October 2013, but only after NHTSA opened an investigation [PDF] into the defect.


NHTSA reports there have been no fatalities related to the defect, but six consumers reported collisions, including two with injuries.


As part of its agreement with NHTSA, Hyundai will make improvements to its process for identifying, reporting and communicating safety-related defects in a timely manner.


Hyundai fined $17.35M for delayed reporting of brake issues [The Associated Press]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Medical Debt Still Stinks, But New Credit Score Change Will Make It Hurt Your Life Less




Credit reporting behemoth FICO is making changes in the way it calculates credit scores. And for once, there’s some good news. The changes are expected to make it easier for most Americans to access credit — that is, to borrow money and take out loans — and will punish fewer consumers for incurring some debts that were out of their control.

As the Wall Street Journal reports, FICO is making two key changes in the way they calculate their numbers, and and those changes will make millions of consumers’ scores go up.


The first is that overdue or delinquent bills that have gone to collections will no longer count as unpaid bills once they have been settled. Currently, if you have a 60 day overdue bill that goes to collections, and you pay the collections department when they call you, that still gets calculated in your credit score as unpaid. Now, the score will treat paid bills as paid bills.


The second change is in relation to medical debt: although medical debts will still be considered in a credit score, they will be given less weight in the calculation.


Unlike a car or house purchase that a consumer has some control over, outlandishly large medical bills can basically drop on to anyone out of the blue after an illness, injury, or accident. No consumer really controls whether they end up with a rare cancer, or if they get hit by a driver who flees the scene while they’re biking to work. As a CFPB study released earlier this year found that although outstanding medical debts lowered consumers’ credit scores, those individuals were just as likely to pay back the rest of their bills on time as borrowers without medical debt were.


The changes will have an impact on tens of millions of Americans. According to the Wall Street Journal, over 64 million Americans have medical collections on their credit reports and over half of all debt-collection activity on consumers’ credit reports comes from medical bills. And of the roughly one-third of the country that has had a bill go to collections, well over 9 million have paid off those bills and will no longer get dinged for them on their credit reports.


Once those two changes start appearing in score calculations, FICO estimates that consumers whose only negative ding on their credit reports is a medical debt will see their scores go up by about 25 points.


25 points may not sound huge on a score spectrum that goes up to 800, but for many individuals it can be the difference between getting a loan and being turned down, or between being shunted into disadvantageous subprime loans and actually receiving reasonable loan terms. Higher credit scores also translate to lower interest rates. On larger loans, like mortgages, even an 0.25% difference in the interest rate offered can mean tens of thousands of extra dollars over the life of the loan.


FICO will be launching their new scoring system, called Score 9, this fall. But it’s not instantaneous — instead, it’s more like a Windows upgrade. And two years after Windows 8 came out, every one of us knows someone somewhere who’s still stuck on XP.


Credit card and auto lenders are likely to upgrade first, says the WSJ, but mortgage lenders often lag a version or two behind. So even though FICO has about 90% of the credit-score market tied up, consumers are still likely to see discrepancies.


FICO Recalibrates Its Credit Scores [Wall Street Journal]

FICO Score 9 Introduces Refined Analysis of Medical Collections [FICO press release]




by Kate Cox via Consumerist

Washington D.C. Hates New Pizza App Because The District Isn’t In Virginia

photo Everyone dreams of the day they can simply push a button and a pizza will magically appear on their doorstep, unless of course, they happen to be residents of the District of Columbia. In what is now starting to sound like a broken record, the inhabitants of D.C. are once again being shutout because their fine city simply isn’t recognized.


The Washington Post reports the latest culprit is Push for Pizza, a smartphone app designed to make ordering pizza a cinch.


Just two days after the app launched, one of the five co-founders reported that “D.C. already hates us.”


That hate has nothing to do with the actual pizza, it has more to do with the message Washington residents receive after trying to use the app: “DC is not a valid state.”


We’ve heard that somewhere else before, right? Oh yea, when a resident was turned away while trying to purchase alcohol in New Hampshire and that other time when a reporter tried to get through airport security, but the TSA agent didn’t know D.C. was part of the United States.


The owners of Push for Pizza quickly found a work around for the issue, telling users to simply put in Virginia as the state and their correct zip code. While that indeed allowed customers to order pizza, the proud residents of D.C. just weren’t feeling it.


Tough talking District residents quickly taught the young entrepreneurs a geography lesson via Twitter.



@TimmyShea: ummm i appreciate the effort, but obviously you don’t understand how offensive it would be for us to list “VA” as our state


@msager: @PushForPizza Washington DC is not in Virginia. I will not use your app unless you add DC to State.



The young entrepreneurs say they learned their lesson; D.C. deserves equal representation – when it comes to pizza anyway. In about a week, a new version that recognizes D.C. will be available.


‘D.C. already hates us,’ says co-founder of pizza app [Washington Post]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

GM Advising Owners Of 182K Recalled SUVs To Park Outside Until Fire Hazard Fixed


Back on June 30, General Motors issued six separate recalls totaling more than 7.5 million vehicles in just the U.S. One of those recalls involved around 182,000 SUVs that were at risk for a fire because of overheating power window switches. It was the third time that GM had recalled these particular vehicles for this problem and it still isn’t fixed. Now the car maker is notifying owners to keep affected SUVs parked outside until the defect is repaired.

The SUVs — model year 2006-2007 Buick Rainier, Chevy Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Isuzu Ascender, and Saab 9-7X — were first recalled in Aug. 2012 [PDF] in cold weather states, where it was believed that salt used to deice roads was doing the damage.


But as complaints continued to pile up, including reports of 28 fires, the recall was expanded nationwide in June 2013.


At the time, GM had believed that it could fix the problem by putting a protective coating around the window switch circuit boards instead of replacing the switches. However, when GM heard of continued malfunctions from owners whose switches had undergone this fix, it decided in June of this year to issue the recall to replace all the potentially defective switches.


Thing is, the fire hazard exists whether the car is in use or not — and at least one fire occurred while an SUV was parked in a driveway — so GM has told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it will be notifying owners to keep their vehicles outside, rather than in a garage where a car fire would likely pose a greater risk to the building and its occupants.


As the AP notes, those cars could be outside for some time, as GM dealers won’t be ready to make these repairs until October at the earliest.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Does Amazon Want Everyone To Know My Neighbor Bought A Fire Phone?

“Amazon would like you to know that there is a $300 phone on your neighbor’s porch,” reader Will wrote to us, attaching a photo that he took in the common area of his condo complex. Could that be? Is Amazon really labeling boxes that contain the Fire Phone with what’s inside and not requiring carriers to ask customers for a signature? Well… no.


facebook-fire-phone


“I couldn’t believe that they would label the contents of a box,” he wrote, noting that all packages for his building get left in that common area. There are about 80 units in the building, which means that anyone could wander off with this phone.


The catch? There probably isn’t a phone inside. We checked with Amazon, and a spokesperson told us that the “Fire phone” tape is simply being used in place of the normal Amazon Prime-branded tape used for shipments via Prime. “The wrapping on the box will be used on all US shipments where tape is used to seal packages – it is not limited to Fire phone deliveries,” she told us.


Seeing this tape on a package doesn’t mean there’s a Fire phone inside the box: Amazon is just taking another opportunity to advertise its new gadget to its frequent customers.




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Hot Sauce-Filled Soda Is Weapon Of Choice For One Taco Bell Customer


We’re pretty sure that throwing any beverage at a Taco Bell employee will get you booted and banned from the store. But since you’re at Taco Bell, why not include some hot sauce in the beverage bomb you toss in the Bell staffer’s face?

Police in the town of Niceville, FL, were called to a Taco Bell restaurant last week after a customer tossed the hot sauce-infused soda in the face of a Taco Bell employee, reports NFWdailynews.com [via Jezebel].


According to the report, the suspect and the victim were both juveniles, which would explain the juvenile behavior.


What’s not explained is whether or not the customer put the hot sauce in the soda herself, and if so, whether she added the sauce for flavoring or to add some sting to it before she threw it at the fast food worker.


It’s also possible that someone at that the Bell put the hot sauce in her drink, which could explain why she’d be so angry to begin with. We may never know, especially since the employee has decided to not pursue charges against the soda-tosser.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Serial Stowaway Strikes Again, Apprehended At LAX Three Days After Last Arrest


Multiple arrests, restraining orders and bans from airports just aren’t enough to keep a serial stowaway from trying to snag a plane seat. A woman arrested Monday at LAX after hopping a Southwest flight from San Jose was arrested yet again Thursday for wandering the airport without a ticket.

The Los Angeles Times reports the 62-year-old woman was taken into custody after authorities spotted her boarding a FlyAway bus at Union Station and getting off at LAX.


Upon exiting the bus, the woman entered the airport and walked through three terminals for nearly an hour. Airport police say she had no intention to purchase a ticket despite having enough money to do so.


“It’s a big deal when anyone tries to avoid security, be it a 62-year-old grandmother or a 24-year-old terrorist,” the airport police chief told The Times.


The woman made headlines earlier this week when she was arrested after sneaking on a Southwest flight from Mineta San Jose International Airport to LAX.


A source familiar with that incident says the woman attempted to get around TSA ticket screeners three times before finally slipping by while an agent was examining a family’s tickets.


The woman then reportedly went through security screening devices before unsuccessfully attempting to board several planes in the B terminal of the airport. Eventually she was able to sidle past the gate operator and onto the Southwest Flight to LAX.


It was unclear why the woman was not removed from the terminal following her unsuccessful attempts to board other flights.


A head count of passengers on the flight, which continued on to Phoenix, didn’t add up to the correct number, so the crew asked everyone to show their tickets. Unable to produce a ticket out of thin air, the stowaway was arrested.


Before successfully boarding that flight, the woman had been arrested six times related to attempts to sneak on planes or circumventing airport security at San Francisco International Airport, where she’s also banned.


According to the Times, on Wednesday the woman pleaded no contest and promised not to return to LAX without a ticket.


However, airport police weren’t about to take her on her word, officials circulated fliers with a photograph of the woman to officers and staff, you know, just in case she turned up again. And they were right.


Stowaway banned from LAX is arrested again at the airport [The Los Angeles Times]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist