Competitive Eater Gobbles Down 9.35 Pounds Of Turkey In 10 Minutes


So you’re planning on eating a whole lot of turkey on Thanksgiving, huh? Good luck trying to get anywhere near the amount of turkey the winner of a holiday-themed eating contest just shoved down his gullet in the amount of time it takes me to decide how large of a scoop of mashed potatoes I can serve myself without having everyone behind me in line hate me.

Competitive eater Joey Chestnut shoveled an entire turkey (barring the bones and other inedible bits, naturally) in under 10 minutes, reports CBS Philly, showing that the holiday birds aren’t the only ones going “gobble, gobble gobble.”


“I stuck with my plan going for the bottom meat first then got the breasts and then just drank and drank and swallowed,” he said after the Connecticut event, reports the New York Daily News. “It’s before Thanksgiving when everybody is a competitive eater. Turkey is awesome. I’m just happy to be here and was able to win today.”


Each participant had a fully cooked 20-pound turkey and were then left to their own devices to figure out the best way to rip the bird apart and ingest as many pounds as possible.


The events sponsor, Major League Eating, called the contest “a battle of technique, speed, capacity and Thanksgiving spirit.”


For his efforts, Chestnut walks away with $5,000 that he will probably not spend on turkey.




Joey Chestnut Wins Turkey Eating Contest [CBS Philly]

Joey Chestnut sets record at turkey-eating contest [New York Daily News]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Activision Going After YouTubers Who Post Call Of Duty Glicth, Exploit Videos

The initial warning message sent out by Machinima to users alerting them to increased vigilance on Activision's part. (Photo: @BroTeamPill)

The initial warning message sent out by Machinima to users alerting them to increased vigilance on Activision’s part. (Photo: @BroTeamPill)



Video Game clips make up a sizable chunk of the most popular content on YouTube, and its becoming easier and easier for gamers to share short videos online, and game publishers rarely try to flex their copyright muscle to get clips taken down because they know it’s good publicity. Someone failed to tell this to Activision, which has been flagging Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare videos, but only those that highlight that the game has flaws.

YouTube works on a “strike” system that tallies up the number of copyright complaints a user gets before facing a ban. According to Ars Technica, the game-streaming folks at Machinima recently began alerting its video creators to be careful about posting Call of Duty videos because Activision had begun “issuing strikes on videos showing glitches.”


Activision then confirmed this, explaining that it was looking for “videos that promote cheating and unfair exploits.”


So posting a clip of errors, like people falling through levels or figures floating in mid-air, are apparently a no-no. Also strike-worthy are clips that show how you can exploit those glitches for your own success or amusement.


This, in spite of the fact that there are huge segments of YouTube devoted just to funny glitches and interesting exploits.


But rather than fix these exploits, Activision would rather leverage the threat of a YouTube ban into getting people to stop posting them.


And the game publisher has even more pull by dangling that Sword of Damocles over the heads of a huge streaming network like Machinima, whose business could be harmed if enough of its content creators are flagged.


“When a channel receives a certain number of strikes it is possible that they may be blocked as a YouTube partner,” explained Machinima in a statement, saying that its actions were taken “to protect not only its network partners, but its publisher partners as well.”


Activision may be able to strong-arm large YouTube networks, but there are still plenty of CoD glitch videos available for viewing. We’d love to see the company try to explain why it is cherry-picking which videos and networks while leaving huge swaths of clips untouched.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

’70s LEGO Flyer Reminds Everyone Toy Used To Be Gender-Neutral

LEGO is one toy that is, in theory, gender-neutral. They’re just blocks, decals, and figurines. Yet toys today tend to be highly gender-segregated, even when they’re items that don’t necessarily have to be. Usually, we don’t think of the past as more enlightened, but in the case of LEGO, it’s striking how different their marketing in the ’70s was compared to today.


lego_to_parents


Here’s a transcript:



To parents


The urge to create is equally strong in all children. Boys and girls.

It’s imagination that counts. Not skill. You build whatever comes into your head, the way you want it. A bed or a truck. A dolls house or a spaceship.

A lot of boys like dolls houses. They’re more human than spaceships.

A lot of girls prefer spaceships. They’re more exciting than dolls houses.

The most important thing is to put the right material in their hands and let them create whatever appeals to them.



While some viewers on Reddit where the document was originally shared were skeptical that the letter was real, citing font differences and the company’s logo, the company confirmed earlier today that the letter is authentic. In a statement published by TechDigest, a Lego spokesperson explained that at its core, the company’s message remains the same.



The text remains relevant to this day – our focus has always been, and remains to bring creative play experiences to all children in the world, based on the LEGO brick and the LEGO system – ultimately enabling children to build and create whatever they can imagine.



While some people have been critical of the character-based LEGO Friends product line aimed at the pink side of the toy department, the context of the flyer addressed to parents is important: it was apparently included with a LEGO dollhouse set. We don’t know whether it was meant for the parents of girls as an invitation to buy more LEGO sets, or for the parents of boys to reassure them that a dollhouse is a fine toy for boys to play with.


70s Lego had the right idea [Reddit]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Some Jerk Runs Over Guy At McDonald’s Drive-Thru, Grabs Food Before Leaving


It’s bad enough to commit a hit-and-run, but when you’ve got enough time to stop and pick up some grub while you flee, well that’s just a total jerk move. The family of a New York City man who was run over in the McDonald’s drive-thru say they found out the driver stopped long enough to grab his food from the window afterward, instead of calling the police.

The victim’s family tell the New York Post that a worker at the Queens restaurant told them the hungry suspect made sure to get his meal before fleeing early Saturday. They say the victim was hanging out with friends and leaning on a car when he accidentally fell into the drive-thru lane.


“It breaks my heart to read that he got run over, the car reversed, and then drove off and he was left to die,” his sister told the NYP. “The world is so cruel, so inhuman. How do you leave a man to die? At least call.”


He survived, and was released from the hospital on Sunday.


Thus far, cops don’t have a description of the driver, who remains at large, and may or may not not be aware of running the man over in the first place.


Hungry driver hits man at McDonald’s, picks up food, drives off: sources [New York Post]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

General Motor’s Ignition Switch Death Toll Rises To 35


Less than a year ago, General Motors claimed that only 13 fatalities had resulted from a faulty ignition switch issue. Now three months after a plan to compensate victims was set up, 35 death claims have been accepted.

Reuters reports that two additional deaths have been attributed to the defective switch, while no additional injury claims were approved.


So far, the victim compensation plan, which began accepting claims on August 1, has received 2,180 claims for injuries and deaths.


According to the weekly report submitted by Ken Feinberg, the lawyer tasked with heading the plan, the number of claims received for injuries and deaths was up about 3% from one week ago.


Overall, the fund has received 225 claims for deaths, 139 for catastrophic injuries and 1,816 for less-serious injuries requiring hospitalization.


Of the approved claims, 35 have been for deaths, five for severe injuries and 39 for other injuries.


Feinberg says in his weekly report that 215 claims have been deemed ineligible, 455 have lacked sufficient paperwork or evidence and 1,076 have no documentation al all.


Last week, GM announced that the plan would continue to accept claims until January 31, one month longer than the initial deadline of December 31.


Feinberg says in a statement at the time that additional notices are being mailed to approximately 850,000 newly registered owners and to those individuals for whom a change in registration, change of address or corrected address has been received.


“I believe that the many efforts to reach all possible GM automobile owners, former owners and others who might have been adversely impacted by a defective ignition switch have been both comprehensive and effective,” Feinberg said. “There will always be some individuals who do not receive formal notice and are generally unaware of available compensation. But such individuals appear to be very few in number.”


Officials with GM previously said they expect to spend $400 million on claims, but that could rise as high as $600 million.


When the fund was launched over the summer, GM said there would be no cap to the claims, but that compensation would be tied to the level of injury and loss experienced. An approved death claim is expected to result in an offer of compensation for at least $1 million, plus payments of $300,000 to surviving family members.


Consumers who suffered life-altering injuries could receive even more when the cost of lifetime medical care, lost earnings power and other factors are considered.


The plan also addresses consumers who faced less-severe injuries. Those who were treated at a hospital or an outpatient medical facility within 48 hours of the accident are eligible for a claim.


The formula for that claim is $20,000 for one night in the hospital; $70,000 for two to seven overnights, $170,000 for eight to 15 overnights, with a maximum of $500,000 for 32 or more overnights. Those treated on an outpatient basis could receive a maximum of $20,000.


The claimants are not obligated to accept the compensation, but if they do take the money they give up their rights to pursue legal action against GM with regard to the ignition defect.


The compensation program covers approximately 1.6 million model-year 2003-2007 recalled vehicles manufactured with an ignition switch defect and approximately 1 million model year 2008-2011 recalled vehicles that may have been repaired with a recalled ignition switch.


Two more deaths identified by GM ignition-switch program [Reuters]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Old Navy Changes Policy For Plus-Size Returns, Adding Customer Panel To Make Better Clothes

Old Navy will continue to charge more for certain plus-size items -- like the jeans seen in the top row here -- but will change its return policy and create a focus group of fuller-figure customers.

Old Navy will continue to charge more for certain plus-size items — like the jeans seen in the top row here — but will change its return policy and create a focus group of fuller-figure customers.



A couple weeks back we told you about a petition asking Old Navy why it charges significantly more for plus-size women’s clothing but the largest men’s apparel is the same price as the mediums and smalls. The retailer explained to us that its women’s items are specially designed while the menswear is just larger versions of the same items, but there were still lingering questions, like why are there fewer plus-size options and why can’t you return them in the store?

In a formal response to the petition on Change.org, Old Navy’s parent company Gap Inc. admits that there is “a lot of room for improvement in the way plus-size clothes are designed and marketed throughout the industry-at-large,” and while flashing its plus-size bona fides — like offering a line for women for 20 years — the company adds that “we always want to learn and see how we can improve.”


First up is the return policy, which currently requires customers to mail back their plus-size purchases instead of taking them to a store. Gap says that, starting Dec. 5, Old Navy stores will begin accepting plus-size in-store returns.


Then starting in January, the company plans to create a customer panel “to gather insights that will further enhance our plus size collections.”


It’s basically a brainstorming/focus group that will meet quarterly to “test drive” and provide feedback on new plus-size offerings from the retailer.


Gap Inc. is still standing by its higher prices for certain plus-size items, maintaining that these are separate designs that require additional work.


Renee Posey, the customer who created the petition, had expressed concerns about Old Navy’s initial response, but says that the change to the return policy and the new panel is a “huge victory” for petitioners.


“It shows good faith that they are committed to changing policies that unfairly single out full-figured women and opens an important line of communication between their organization and their plus-sized customers that has long been needed,” writes Posey in a statement. “During our discussions, they have assured me that all options are on the table — from price changes to bringing the Plus line back into brick & mortar stores — and I look forward to working together with them to make the long-term, overarching changes to their pricing structure, design process and retail environment that are needed to create a shopping experience that offers plus-sized women the fashionable clothing they want in stores and at a fair price.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

TSA Would Like To Remind Everyone Flying For The Holidays That You Can’t Bring Guns In Your Carry-On


After a record year finding guns in travelers’ carry-on bags at the nation’s airports, the Transportation Security Administration wants to take a second to remind everyone flying for the holidays that weapons need to be in your checked baggage and declared to authorities.

Through Nov. 17, the TSA has stopped a record 1,931 travelers attempting to get on planes with guns in their carry-on bags, reports CNNMoney, up from last year’s 1,813.


And this year’s number doesn’t even include the busiest travel days of the year around Thanksgiving and Christmas, which makes it likely that the total will climb even higher by the end of 2014.


In one recent week, the TSA found 35 guns, 29 of which were loaded in passengers’ carry-on bags.


A TSA spokesman said the “vast majority” of travelers found to have guns in their carry-ons say it’s a case of just forgetting that the weapon was in there when they left for the airport.


If you’re caught with a gun going through security, you could face criminal penalties as well as civil penalties, including hefty fines.


Other weapons you most definitely cannot keep in your carry-on while flying: Knives, daggers concealed in canes, box cutters, sabers and scissors, cricket bats, cattle prods, ski poles and golf clubs. That’s not to mention throwing stars and blow torches. Toy weapons of any kind are also a no-no.


If you do want to fly with a gun, many states allow fliers to pack them in their checked luggage, unloaded and properly stored, as well as declared to officials.


When in doubt, check the TSA list of prohibited items before you fly.


TSA confiscates record number of guns at airports [CNNMoney]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Can Retailers Make Us Stop Returning So Much Stuff?


After the holiday shopping frenzy is over, frenzy season isn’t yet complete: in malls and in post offices alike, shoppers then go into an item-returning and gift-card-spending frenzy. Unfortunately, this costs retailers a lot of money. Instead of accepting the cost of returns as a recurring annual thing, can they find a way to reduce them?

As far as the holiday season goes, the ideal would be to make sure that people buy the gifts that they want in the first place instead of bearing the cost of returns afterward. Short of making gift card purchases and Amazon wish lists mandatory, we’re not really sure how to do this. Neither are retailers. That’s why they’re focusing on getting people to return fewer of the items that we buy for ourselves, especially online.


Specifically, they want you to stop buying three of the same item when ordering clothing and shoes online so you can keep the one that fits and send everything else back. One industry analyst explained to Bloomberg Businessweek that retailers actually hate having to accept so many items back, but no one wants to be the first to tighten their return policy.



Consumers will often buy sizes 2, 4, and 6 and return two of them. I remember talking to a retailer, who said, ‘I think free returns are a stupid policy. It’s not cost-effective for me.’ But everyone is terrified of losing market share, losing their customers.



Businessweek reports that online sales analytics help companies figure out which items tend to be sent back the most often and why, and virtual reality fit models can show shoppers how something would look on a model with their exact proportions. Neat.


Retailers Look to Technology to Trim Holiday Merchandise Returns [Bloomberg Businessweek]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Swedish Hotel Offering Free 7-Night Stays For People With More Than 2,000 Facebook Friends


We already know the value companies place on attracting new fans on social media, which is part of the reason using sites like Facebook and Instagram is free: Advertisers want your attention and they want the attention of your friends. So in order to harness the power of social media, one Swedish hotel is offering up a tasty bit of bait in the form of free stays for the big hitters on Facebook and Instagram.

That maximum seven-night stay at the luxury Nordic Light Hotel in Stockholm comes with some strings attached, of course: Guests who have 2,000 private friends on Facebook or 100,000 fans on Facebook or Instagram can get a free room, but they’ll have to post updates at check-in and check-out, as well as mentioning the hotel’s website and other name-dropping opportunities on social media.


The hotel usually charges up to $360 per night for a room, reports The Mirror, making the deal that much more interesting.


Not feeling like the coolest kid in school? There are other discounts available to the less popular of us out there: If you’ve got 1,500 private friends on Facebook/15,000 followers on Instagram it’s a 15% discount, 1,000 Facebook friends/10,000 Instagram followers gets you 10% off and 500 Facebook peeps/5,000 Instagrammers is a 5% decrease.


Maybe it’s time to start responding to all those friend requests from people in high school you never spoke to.


Got loads of Facebook friends? You can stay in this exclusive hotel for FREE [The Mirror]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

HBO Hints You Might Be Paying Cable Company For Standalone HBO Go


It’s been more than a month since HBO confirmed its long-awaited plans to launch an online-only version of the premium TV network that wouldn’t require a cable subscription. While there are still no real details about exactly what customers are getting or how much they want to pay, it does look like you’ll be ordering the service through the same cable company you’re trying to get away from.

Last week, HBO CEO Richard Plepler explained during a discussion at the Paley Center for Media that he doesn’t believe the existence of a standalone version of HBO would not cannibalize its pay-TV business, figuring there are between 10 to 15 million broadband-only consumers who would sign up for the service. Hopefully, that’s an indication that the service’s price point will be reasonable.


More importantly, Plepler pish-poshed the notion that the streaming-only service would hurt the cable companies that currently make upwards of $15/month for HBO.


“Who controls the broadband pipes in the U.S.? Our distributors,” he explained. “There is gold in the hills, lets go get it together … its your money too.”


Perhaps we’re reading too much into this, but the only way the cable companies could see “gold in the hills” of a standalone HBO Go is if they were getting a piece of the pie too.


We’ve theorized in the past that this would be the path of least resistance for HBO, as it would allow the cable companies to continue making money off HBO subscriptions and let HBO sell a product without having to handle all the customer service costs and problems that come with running a consumer-facing operation.


If that’s the case, then there’s the concern that the standalone HBO service might be available only through cable operators willing to sell it. Hopefully, HBO creates a work-around so that consumers aren’t held hostage to the endless negotiation standoffs between cable operators and content companies.


Of course, this is all speculation, as we wait impatiently for HBO to reveal concrete details about the upcoming service, and whether or not competitors like Starz and Showtime will follow HBO’s lead.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist