Tesla Batteries Might Be The Next Big Threat To Electric Companies




Electric cars might not be great for gas companies, but they feel like a net win for the electric utilities: after all, if you’re plugging in a Tesla in the garage every night, that’s a little more juice they can charge you for using. Tesla’s goal, though, isn’t just to make cars less environmentally hostile, but to make everything else that way too. And that might just be a huge problem for existing electric utilities.

Most electric utilities aren’t quite caught up to what Tesla’s doing, but the ones that have should probably be scared, Bloomberg reports.


The electric-car company is breaking ground on a battery “gigafactory” in Nevada. The factory itself is being designed to have essentially zero emissions and be as eco-friendly as possible. It will not draw power from the electric grid, instead generating its own wind and solar power on site — making the Nevada desert a perfect location.


The factory will not only be making batteries for use powering Tesla’s current and future lines of all-electric cars, but also for the “storage market.” That storage line gets thrown in quickly and then passed over in most press releases and media stories but, Bloomberg says, it’s actually a huge deal.


Those batteries can be paired with home solar panels, which are also getting less expensive every year. A homeowner who installs solar panels (also conveniently made by an Elon Musk company) and can store the excess energy for later use in a rainy week, using one of Tesla’s batteries, suddenly doesn’t even need to be connected to the local grid even for backup.


One analyst told Bloomberg that battery storage is “the Holy Grail for renewables,” because “the energy is intermittent. Finding a way to store that is very powerful.”


Another consultant described the potential to Bloomberg as a “mortal threat,” saying, “That [battery and solar panel package] is an unregulated product you can buy at Home Depot that leaves the old business model with no place to hide.”


Of course, just because people can go installing new energy systems at home doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily going to do it… but they certainly might.


About 40% of all plug-in electric cars sold in the U.S. go to Californians, Bloomberg says. And in California, roughly half of all those 100,000 people who have electric cars either already have solar power at home, or have plans to install it.


California has over 38 million residents, so the 50,000 homeowners who want to use solar power aren’t exactly an existential threat just yet. And Tesla’s factory won’t be online and operational for years yet to come.


But the future can come quickly. Right now, at $70-$100k, Teslas are too pricey for most folks. But with a $30,000 model launching in a few years, electric cars will become more accessible to millions more families. And economies of scale are a real thing: the more widely a technology gets adopted, the more efficiently a company can manufacture it, and the less expensive and more widespread it can continue to become.


Analysts think that the industry is drastically underestimating just how far Tesla has already come, Bloomberg writes. They quote Morgan Stanley analysts, who said “There is not sufficient appreciation of the magnitude of energy storage cost reduction that Tesla has already achieved, nor of the further cost reduction magnitude that Tesla might be able to achieve once the company has constructed its gigafactory.”


Ultimately, Bloomberg concludes, the landscape is changing. So far, electric utilities can do what they like because most consumers don’t exactly have a way to make their own electricity at home. But soon, many of us might. At that point, utilities are going to have to change somehow… whether or not they want to.


Why Elon Musk’s Batteries Scare the Hell Out of the Electric Company [Bloomberg]




by Kate Cox via Consumerist

Why Are 100,000 People On A Waiting List To Buy Duck Boots From L.L. Bean?

nooooooobootsDo you need a warm and waterproof pair of boots so you can tromp through serious snow, slush, and ice this winter? If so, you really should have planned ahead. L.L. Bean reports that their duck boots (which are not made out of actual ducks) for men and women alike are pre-ordered so far in advance that for some sizes, you’ll be waiting around until mid-March to get your boots.


Like most trends that are making people miserable, the experts blame millennials. Specifically, high school and college students and urban-dwellers who have suddenly decided that classic waterproof footwear is back in style. The boots cost $139, but are one product that L.L. Bean still manufactures in the United States, so it was a decent choice of footwear to suddenly make trendy again.


It’s not like the company can just hire more workers and crank out enough boots to feed the trend until Christmas is over, either. “Making more boots is also a slow process given the specialization needed to produce the hand-crafted boots,” a company spokesperson explained to Yahoo Style, presumably while strapping on some snowshoes to go visit the boot warehouse. It takes a new boot-maker 26 weeks to master the stitching, so those darn kids really should have given the company at least nine months’ notice before turning the boots into a hot item. So rude.


Yahoo reports that the company is on track to sell about 450,000 pairs of boots this year, and the waiting list stands at 100,000 right now.


L.L. Bean’s Already Sold Out of Snow Boots [Yahoo Style] (via Racked)




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

For-Profit College Hired Exotic Dancers As Admissions Reps

FastTrain The operators of a now-defunct for-profit college in Florida allegedly told its admissions directors to do whatever it took to sell the school to potential students. Among the tactics used by the school is one straight out of a wacky, low-budget, late-night college movie you might see on Cinemax.


According to a lawsuit [PDF] filed earlier this week by Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida against the operators of the FastTrain chain of colleges, the school used exotic dancers to entice young males to apply to the school.


“FastTrain employed female exotic dancers as admissions representatives… to lure young male students,” reads the complaint, which says that admissions directors then “encouraged them to dress provocatively while they recruited young men in neighborhoods to attend FastTrain.”


The goal, alleges the suit, was to get as many students enrolled in the school as possible in order to get these students to take out federal student loans. That money would go to the school, and the student is left on the hook whether or not they graduate, get a decent education, or ever have the ability to repay.


Before it closed in 2012, FastTrain operated seven campuses in Florida’s Miami-Dade, Broward, Hillsborough, Pinellas and Duval counties.


According to the complaint, starting as far back as 2009 FastTrain “knowingly submitted, or caused to be submitted, numerous false claims” for payments through the U.S. Dept. of Education’s student aid programs.


FastTrain allegedly lied about students’ eligibility for aid, claiming these students had high school diplomas (or equivalents) when they did not.


The government says that FastTrain admissions personnel coached prospective ineligible students to lie on their Free Application for Federal Student Aid form “in order for FastTrain to secure more federal funding for students than the students were eligible to receive.”


FastTrain allegedly took in more than $4.3 million in federal student loans and another $2.21 million in Federal Pell Grants that shouldn’t have been given.


“Federal financial student aid programs are designed to assist students obtain an education. Those who misuse federal funds will be brought to justice and held accountable,” said U.S. Attorney Ferrer.


While Florida AG Bondi says that “Taking advantage of students in order to exploit federal financial aid programs is reprehensible, and we will continue to work with our federal partners to protect Florida students and the integrity of federal financial aid.”


The school’s owner, Alex Amor, and other individuals associated with FastTrain were charged earlier this fall in a 15-count indictment with conspiracy to steal government funds.


[via Local10.com]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Sprint Exec Admits That “Half-Off” Offer Will Likely Only Result In Savings Of Around 20%


Earlier this week, Sprint introduced a new offer for current Verizon and AT&T customers looking to switch service — same amount of data at half the price. We noted at the time that the major catch to this deal is that you have to pay full price for your new phone when you switch (or pay $200), but how much would that cut into your savings? According to one top Sprint exec, quite a lot.

As we pointed out in our original story, getting the half-off deal from Sprint requires that you not just jump ship from AT&T or Verizon but that you also get a new phone through Sprint using either its Easy Pay system (which charges full price but in monthly installments) or by paying full sticker price for your new phone outright.


Even though AT&T and Verizon have been nudging customers into similar installment programs like AT&T Next and Verizon Edge, most current subscribers are still on plans where they buy discounted phones in exchange for agreeing to two-year contracts with their provider. By one estimate from Verizon, only around 2% of its customers are on Edge.


So while jumping to Sprint would indeed cut the monthly amount customers are charged for data/voice/text, those savings would be partially offset by the added cost of paying off a full-price phone.


Speaking earlier this week at a Merrill Lynch conference, CFO Joe Euteneuer admitted that a switching customer’s savings would not be exactly half of what it was at AT&T or Verizon.


“They are still probably getting a 20% sort of net discount,” he explained.


For 20% off their bill, we could imagine lots of people jumping ship between AT&T, Verizon, or even T-Mobile, as they all provide high-speed LTE service. But until Sprint can get demonstrate that its LTE network is reliable and fast, it will probably only win over customers looking to save a bit of money in exchange for a possible loss in service quality.


[via DSL Reports]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Don’t Want To Buy An Ugly Holiday Sweater You’ll Only Wear Once? Now You Can Rent It

uglysweaterRTR If you don’t have a female relative over the age of 50 who can conveniently provide you with a glittery, puffy landscape of giant snowflakes and bedazzled Christmas trees, it’s understandable that you don’t want to drop the big bucks on an ugly holiday sweater you’ll never wear again after that Ugly Holiday Sweater Party you’ll inevitably be invited to at some point in your life. As an alternative, now you can rent one. And never see it again, like that other mistake you made last holiday season.


The folks who rent designer dresses with hefty price tags at Rent the Runway have launched an Ugly Holiday Sweater collection to help those in need of an atrocious item of clothing on the cheap.


Sweaters vary by your location, for a total of 12 in the collection whose sole purpose is to make you look as fashionably idiotic as is possibly this holiday season.


You want a bunch of teddy bears? Got’em. A creepy 3D Christmas clown sewn onto your chest, adorned with a red tinsel fringe? Okay then, wear that and try not to have nightmares later.


This is what I dream of when I drink too much egg nog.

This is what I dream of when I drink too much egg nog.



Sweaters only come in one-size-fits all size, at a four-day rental cost of $15.




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Starbucks Wants To Open A Chain Of Even More Upscale Coffee Shops


You may have thought that Starbucks was already an upscale coffee chain. Perhaps it is, compared to brewing your own Folgers at home, but there are even pricier coffee shops out there that offer even finer coffees. Starbucks wants to compete with these shops, which you haven’t heard of because you can’t afford to visit: even if you can, you probably don’t want to pay $45 for a pound of roasted beans.

Maybe we’re generalizing about Consumerist readers: if so, and if you crave a gourmet coffee experience, maybe Starbucks’ new venture is for you. In Seattle, the chain has opened the first store of its planned mini-chain, the Starbucks Reserve Roastery and Tasting Room. There, you can find single-batch coffees that come from just one farmer.


One difficulty with this business model is that people who seek out an even more upscale coffee experience do so because they look down on Starbucks’ products and ubiquity. If there’s a Reserve Roastery in every large and medium-sized city, that doesn’t make their local roaster unique. Patronizing a corporate coffee shop means losing some credibility as a coffee snob and person who specifically seeks out a more expensive experience that is not Starbucks.


One consumer expert explains to the New York Times that what customers really want are “singular experiences” with their food and drink when a consistent experience is what chains like Starbucks are about. Yet CEO Howard Schultz says that he has been brewing this idea for most of the last decade, keeping track of ideas in scrapbooks. The company has invested millions in this new singular coffee experience, but will a chain where people can buy pricey beans and pay $4 to $7 for a cup take off nationwide? The growth of specialty roasters nationwide indicates that coffee drinkers might. The important hurdle might be getting past their possible distaste for the Starbucks brand, like selling $8 higher quality burgers at McDonald’s.


Starbucks, Facing a Saturated Market, Looks to the High End [New York Times]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Cat Owners Who Value A Smell-Free Home Should Thank This Guy For Inventing Kitty Litter

Not the inventor of kitty litter. (cloudzilla)

Not the inventor of kitty litter. (cloudzilla)



Cat owners: There is a debt of gratitude to be paid. Every time you walk into a home with a cat that doesn’t smell like cat pee, and every night that you spend comfortably in your bed with your favorite feline friend snoozing cozily on your feet is all because of one guy, when you get right down to it. He is the guy who invented kitty litter.

Seriously — the past was terrible before kitty litter. Sandboxes didn’t mask that awful ammonia scent that is the scourge of every cat owner, thus requiring many people to put kitty out for the night to do his bathroom business.


But then a man with an idea for chicken nesting material came along and changed everything, reports Businessweek.


A Michigan man named Ed Lowe in 1947 had the idea to take fuller’s earth, a kind of clay, and sell it to farmers for chickens to nest in, calling it Chicken Litter. Farmers weren’t biting however, but someone else had a need for a pile of dirt.


A local woman dropped by his dad’s delivery businesses in need of some sand for her cat box, as it was January and time for Mr. Whiskers to come in for the cold. Inspiration struck, and he offered her the fuller’s earth instead.


As it turns out, the stuff absorbed the ammonia stench, and the woman came back for more, bringing all her cat-loving friends.


And so it began — Lowe put fuller’s earth in bags, labeling them KITTY LITTER, and started selling it at hardware stores, supermarkets and pet stores.


He kept expanding his business in the face of new competition (anyone can sell dirt in a bag with the right customers), until his Tidy Cat brand officially launched in 1954, cementing Lowe in the Cat Owners’ Hall Of Fame forever.


“We aim to stay No. 1,” he said, “in a No. 2 business.”


The next time your foot falls asleep on a cold winter’s day because Sir Fancymittens cannot be disturbed from his slumber on it, just thank Ed Lowe. Because when a cat’s gotta go, he’s gonna go and it’s not going to smell nice if there’s no kitty litter.


The Birth of Kitty Litter [Businessweek]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

26-Year Delta Air Lines Vet Says He Was Fired After Criticizing Baggage Handler Pay


There is a game of he said/airline said going on between a baggage handler who was recently fired after more than two decades on the job. He claims he was fired for speaking out publicly on his co-workers’ wages while Delta maintains that the man’s statements were untrue and in violation of company policy.

In a recent video for a group called Workday Minnesota, the veteran baggage handler made the statement that “A lot of the Delta workers make… under $15 an hour,” estimating that around half of them make below that $15/hour mark.


Some believe that this remark, along with the man’s history as a labor activist, that led Delta to fire him.


Federal labor laws generally prohibit retaliation against employees for making statements about wages., but the airline claims that the longtime worker was dismissed for making disparaging and untrue remarks.


“Delta regrets any instance where a longtime employee is terminated,” reads a statement to the Pioneer Press. “However, Delta requires all employees to meet company performance and conduct standards. This includes upholding our core values of respect and honesty in any communications regarding Delta.”


The airline says it “invites healthy, constructive discussion across all areas of its business,” and that it applies “policies consistently and in a nondiscriminatory manner, based on an individual’s conduct and record of job performance, without regard to anyone’s personal views.”


The fired employee maintains that his statement about Delta wages is accurate when you factor in pay for contract workers.


[via Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal]




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Sears Holdings Admits Plans To Close 105 More Stores, Won’t Say Which Ones


Last week, we shared an updated version of a list naming 109 Kmart and Sears stores reported by employees or local media outlets to be closing by early 2015. While Sears still won’t confirm or deny these reports on a company-wide level, the company did tell investors as part of its quarterly earnings report this week that it plans to close 105 more stores by the beginning of next year.

Closing stores that aren’t profitable is part of any turnaround plan when a retail chain is in trouble, and as Sears finds itself in need of more cash to stay in business, the company is picking up the pace of store closings. The company is considering forming a real estate investment trust and selling some stores to it, has borrowed a large amount of money from its own CEO with store buildings as collateral, and has been been working out deals to rent or sublease all or part of any store in which other retailers show interest.


Still, some experts believe that the retailer remains in a death spiral, and that efforts to sell or spin off Sears Holdings assets that still have value (like store buildings and the Lands’ End brand) are only an attempt to salvage something from the pieces of a company that was once a global retailing icon.


Sears Holdings Reports Third Quarter 2014 Results [Sears Holdings]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Singapore Airlines Accidentally Sells 900 Business Class Fares At Economy Price


Travelers who thought they’d lucked into some magically low fares on Singapore Airlines are in for a disappointment — the airline says that after a computer glitch allowed Australian travel agents to sell 900 business class fares at economy prices, the agents will either have to provide the difference in fare, or passengers will have the option of flying economy or getting a full refund.

The flights between Singapore and Europe weren’t loaded into the system correctly by the airline, reports News.com.au, allowing for a whole bunch of cheap fares flying off the digital shelves between Saturday and Monday this week.


A spokeswoman for the airline confirmed that it had “recently reassigned a booking subclass originally designated to economy class bookings to be used for business class bookings from December 8, 2014.”


“We have been notified that a small number of travel agents have sold tickets against this reassigned business class subclass, at an economy class fare level,” said the spokeswoman. “The airfare conditions for the fare clearly stated that it was only valid for economy class travel.”


Agents who don’t want to face collecting more money from their customers to make up the difference in price can pay it themselves, or offer passengers a full refund.


“We are working with our travel agent partners to ensure that our customers are notified of this issue so that steps can be made to ensure there is no disruption to their travel plans,” the spokeswoman said.


Singapore Airlines blames agents for selling business class fares at economy rates [News.com.au]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist