Court Throws Out NJ Turnpike’s Lawsuit Against Pizzeria With Lookalike Logo

A federal judge in New Jersey dismissed the Turnpike Authority's trademark lawsuit over a lookalike logo from a Florida pizza chain.

A federal judge in New Jersey dismissed the Turnpike Authority’s trademark lawsuit over a lookalike logo from a Florida pizza chain.



Last summer, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority sued the small Florida-based Jersey Boardwalk pizzeria chain over the restaurant’s logo, which looks remarkably similar to that of the Garden State Parkway. Earlier this week, a federal court in New Jersey dismissed the suit saying that the pizza chain didn’t have enough contact with the state to allow for the Turnpike Authority to file a lawsuit there.

The court’s dismissal of the case [PDF] centers on the issue of jurisdiction, i.e., whether the Turnpike Authority could file a trademark infringement lawsuit against a company that does no real business in the state.


Jersey Boardwalk doesn’t operate any stores anywhere in the vicinity of New Jersey and has only sold, via online orders, a handful of merchandise to NJ residents, though it’s likely that many of these customers only made these purchases after hearing of the lawsuit.


“Although Plaintiff may have felt the brunt of harm in New Jersey, it could not be said that New Jersey is the focal point of the offending activity,” explains the judge. “Florida is the focus of the activity. The spread of the allegedly infringing mark via merchandise sales on the internet is random and fortuitous.”


Additionally, the Turnpike Authority argued that when Boardwalk Pizza shipped a truck full of aid materials to areas impacted by Hurricane Sandy, it was a “publicity stunt resulting in purposeful availment,” but the judge said he was “not persuaded” by this contention.


“That contact with New Jersey is still too attenuated to put the Defendants on notice that they would be subject to a trademark infringement suit in New Jersey,” writes the judge.


Finally, the Turnpike folks also Plaintiff’s argument that use of “Jersey” in the restaurant’s name and marketing constitutes purposeful availment of New Jersey, but again the judge was not persuaded.


“While the Defendants are evoking sentimentality with New Jersey natives in Florida for the purposes of winning customers, this appeal to the idea of ‘Jersey’ does not demonstrate purposeful availment of the privileges of doing business in New Jersey,” he concludes. “On the contrary, the Defendants’ use of the idea of ‘Jersey’ or ‘Italian food from Jersey’ bears an element of nostalgia or even exoticism that is clearly directed to consumers outside of New Jersey.”


Given that the judge’s dismissal was based on a jurisdictional issue, it’s possible that the Turnpike Authority could file trademark suit in Florida.


“The ruling relates only to the question of what court should hear the complaint,” a rep for the Turnpike Authority tells the New Jersey Law Journal. “The court did not rule in any way on the merits of the case. The Turnpike Authority will continue to take action to protect its valuable marks… The authority will take some time to consider its options before deciding what step to take next in the civil matter.”


The pizzeria has twice been granted a trademark on its restaurant logos. The company’s attorney says that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office was aware both times of the similarity to the Garden State Parkway logo but approved it anyway.


The USPTO is currently considering a petition — separate from the lawsuit — from the Turnpike Authority to cancel Jersey Boardwalk’s 2013 trademark. Even if the trademark is cancelled, that wouldn’t necessarily mean the pizzeria couldn’t use the logo; just that it would no longer hold the exclusive trademark to it.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

In A Surprise To Absolutely No One, Willie Nelson Has Plans To Sell His Own Brand Of Marijuana


It was only a matter of time: Now that recreational marijuana is legal in five U.S. States, Willie Nelson is fulfilling the silent promise his very existence made to his fans, and planning to launch his own line of weed. Please, sit down before you faint dead away from the shock.

Joining the family of his fellow cannabis connoisseur Bob Marley in the ranks of celebrity pot lines, Nelson will not only debut “Willie’s Reserve,” but also has plans for branded bongs and stores as well, reports the Daily Beast.


After the Redheaded Stranger (talk about a nickname perfect for a strain of pot, eh?) let it slip to the Daily Beast’s James Joiner, his public relations rep followed up and provided a bit more information about the upcoming weed brand.


“He wants it to be something that’s reflective of his passion. Ultimately, it’s his,” the PR rep explains in the interview. “But it was developed by his family, and their focus on environmental and social issues, and in particular this crazy war on drugs, and trying to be a bright light amongst this trail as we’re trying to extract ourselves from the goo of prohibition.”


He adds that there will be stores selling the stuff eventually, that will roll out in states where marijuana is legal. At those stores, Nelson’s business will sell not only Willie’s Reserve, but other strains as well. All suppliers will have to meet certain standards of growing and environmental impact, among other things, in somewhat of an “anti-Walmart” model, the PR guy explained.


“It will be like when you walk into a Whole Foods store. Whole Foods has their 365 brand, or you can buy Stony Brook, or you can buy Horizon,” the PR rep says. It’ll all fall under that umbrella of “here’s our core beliefs, and here’s our mission statement,” and they will be a part of that, to be a part of us.


Willie Nelson Is Launching His Own Brand of Weed [The Daily Beast]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

PayPal Must Pay $7.7M For Processing Transactions In Violation Of U.S. Sanctions


Each year, PayPal processes billions of dollars in transactions. Apparently some of those payments didn’t exactly sit well with the U.S. government and now the company must pay $7.7 million for violating certain sanctions.


In a settlement agreement [PDF] with the U.S. Treasury Dept., PayPal closes the book on allegations related to 486 separate transactions, totaling around $44,000. These transactions allegedly involved countries or groups covered by various sanction programs run by Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.


For example, the government alleges that PayPal processed 136 transactions totaling more than $7,000 to or from a PayPal account for an individual designated by the U.S. State Department as a “Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferator.” PayPal says that though this account was initially overlooked by its interdiction filters, the individual was eventually flagged. However, it wasn’t until he was flagged for the seventh time that his account was eventually blocked and reported to the Treasury’s OFAC.


Other violations included 98 transactions (totaling $19,344.89) in violation of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations; 125 transactions ($8,257.66) in violation of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; 33 transactions ( $3,314.43) in violation of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations; and 94 transactions ($5,925.27) in violation of the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations.


PayPal is not admitting any wrongdoing, and in a statement to CNET, says that “we’ve taken additional steps to support compliance with OFAC regulations with the introduction of real-time scanning of payments and improved processes.”




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Survey Says: Shoppers Prefer Cosmetics With Cruelty-Free, All Natural Labels


When it comes to what we slap on our faces, a new survey says we’ve got more than just beauty on our minds when choosing which cosmetics to buy: Turns out a love for plants, animals and all things natural is the guiding force when shoppers are making decisions in the beauty aisle.

This, according to a survey from Nielsen that asked 1,000 participants of varying ages which beauty brand buzzwords are most important to consumers.


On the top of the list is animal welfare, with “cruelty-free” and “not tested on animals” listed as the most important packaging claim in the survey at 57%, followed by SPF claims (56%) and “all natural” at 53%.


But though the “all natural” claim came in with 53% of participants saying it’s very or moderately important to them, it’s the top contender when it comes to what people are actually willing to pay more for: 46% of people said they’d shell out more dough just to get an all natural product.


Our love of animals only goes so far, it seems — with only 43% of respondents saying they’d be willing to pay more for beauty products that aren’t tested on animals. It was still in the top five however, below all natural, contains SPF, anti-aging/anti-wrinkle and skin firming/lifting and firming.


This means that clearly the sweet spot would be a cheap, all natural, cruelty-free product that contains SPF and keeps you wrinkle-free and looking like you just got out of the Botox salon. Is there such a thing as a Botox salon? Probably, right?


PACKAGE THIS: BEAUTY CONSUMERS FAVOR ‘CRUELTY FREE’ AND ‘NATURAL’ PRODUCT CLAIMS [Nielsen]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Mercedes-Benz Planning To Launch Its First Pickup Truck By 2020


When you think of a Mercedes-Benz, scenes of rugged vehicles hauling heavy loads across rough terrain probably don’t come to mind… yet. That might change with the launch of Daimler’s first Mercedes-Benz pickup truck, which the company is planning to launch by 2020.

After moving into the SUV world in recent years, it seems Mercedes-Benz is ready to take on the rough world of pickup trucks.


“Years ago, SUVs used to be, well, rough,” Volker Mornhinweg, head of Mercedes-Benz Vans, told the Wall Street Journal. “Then they became prettier. Now, we see the same trend in pickup trucks. We see opportunities to enter this market as the first premium brand.”


The midsize truck will be able to carry about 2,200 pounds and comes with four- or six-cylinder engines, and two rows of seats. It’ll also feature many of the interior design elements as other Mercedes-Benz vehicles, with a luxury version including leather interior and chrome furnishings available.


But because Americans are perhaps a bit possessive of the pickup truck, the brand hasn’t yet decided if it will sell the midsize vehicle in the U.S. Instead, the company will be focusing on European, Latin American, Australian and South African markets.


At the very least, a full-size pickup won’t be competing against the big American players anytime soon, says Mornhinweg, not with Ford Motor Co.’s F-150 and General Motors Co.’s Silverado and Chrysler’s Ram on the market.


“The full-size segment is too specific for the U.S. It’s not a global market,” he told the Wall Street Journal. “And it’s dominated by the Big Three. It makes no sense to go there.”


Mercedes-Benz Outlines a Luxury Pickup for Europe, South America [Wall Street Journal]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

White House Acknowledges Health Risk Of Antibiotics Overuse; Critics Say It Fails To Fully Address Problem


In a new White House report on antibiotic resistance, the Obama administration acknowledges the serious public health risk posed by the over-prescription and overuse of antibiotics, and details multi-agency plans to combat the problem. However, many critics of the report say that these plans fail to close a loophole that will allow farmers to continue using medically unnecessary antibiotics on farm animals (who consume 80% of all antibiotics sold in the U.S.) primarily for the purpose of growth promotion.

This morning, a White House official claimed that the newly released National Action Plan for Combating Antibotic-Resistant Bacteria [PDF] is the “most aggressive and most transparent” plan yet from the federal government on the issue.


Indeed the plan does not attempt to sugarcoat the problem, directly stating that “the emergence of drug resistance in bacteria is reversing the miracles of the past eighty years, with drug choices for the treatment of many bacterial infections becoming increasingly limited, expensive, and, in some cases, nonexistent.”


According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 2 million people fall ill to drug-resistant pathogens every year in the U.S. alone, with some 23,000 of these illnesses resulting in death. Those numbers are only expected to grow if doctors and hospitals continue to over-prescribe antibiotics and if farmers continue to use the drugs in animal feed with the goal of raising larger cows and pigs.


One White House official points out that if we can no longer rely on antibiotics to fight infections, it will reverse a century’s worth of medical advances. No more organ transplants or artificial replacements, as patients would likely fall victim to post-surgery infections that are currently treated with antibiotics.


“Inaction is only going to compound what is already a growing problem,” said the official.


To that end, the plan includes several new stewardship, education, and monitoring programs for the use of antibiotics on human patients at hospitals and in doctors offices. For example, the administration aims, over the next five years, to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use by 50% in outpatient settings and by 20% in inpatient settings.


As a 2014 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association showed, 70% of U.S. physicians are still prescribing antibiotics for patients with acute bronchitis, an illness that shouldn’t be treated this way.


The White House plan also seeks to establish state-level programs in all 50 states to monitor regionally important multidrug resistant organisms.


But as mentioned above, use of antibiotics on humans only accounts for less than 20% of all antibiotics sold in the U.S. The vast majority of these drugs is sold to farmers for use on livestock.


And while the White House plan acknowledges that something must be done about this overuse of antibiotics in farm animals, the report seems to accept that simply taking “growth promotion” off the label of of acceptable uses for these drugs will do the trick.


In late 2013, the FDA — after decades of doing nothing on the issue — released voluntarily guidance to the pharmaceutical industry asking drug companies to remove growth promotion as an allowable use for their antibiotics and to require that farmers only use these drugs for disease treatment or prevention.


The drug companies weren’t terribly bothered by this guidance, saying at the time that it wouldn’t hurt their bottom line (and it didn’t, as their stock prices continued to rise). And though growth promotion was taken off the label as a use for these drugs, some companies continued to market the fact that you’d get a fatter pig by using their antibiotic over the competition’s.


This is because the farmers are still allowed to use these drugs for the vague purpose of “disease prevention,” meaning that they only needed to change their reason for using the drugs, not the amount of antibiotics being used.


Mae Wu, attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, says the White House “tries to draw a false distinction between growth promotion uses and disease prevention uses – a distinction not recognized by bacteria. Both uses often involve routine, low doses of antibiotics given to large groups of animals for long periods of time – ideal conditions for breeding drug-resistant bacteria.”


Critics also wonder why the White House plan sets specific targets for reducing frivolous uses of antibiotics in humans, but makes no attempt to set a goal for similar reductions in agricultural antibiotic use.


“This means that the only measure of success will be whether or not companies remove growth claims from the labels – even if on-farm antibiotic use continues to rise,” says Steven Roach, senior analyst for Keep Antibiotics Working. “All the other actions in the National Action Plan – including research, outreach to producers and veterinarians, and improved monitoring – will be wasted as long as the target to be reached falls so short of what needs to be done.”


In response to these critics, a White House official said this morning that “We recognize this is an area where we need better data than what we have now.”


He explained that more species-specific data is needed before further determinations can be made.


“We need to have the evidence that will allow us to target the species that are most susceptible,” said the official.


With regard to criticism that the removing growth-promotion as an acceptable use is ineffective, the official pointed out that it would now be illegal for a farmer to then use that drug solely to get fatter animals.


But that’s only if the farmer admits that their sole reason for using the drug is growth-promotion, which none of them will do publicly. Farmers and their associated veterinarians have repeatedly stood by the defense that they need to put these drugs in animal feed for prophylactic reasons to prevent disease. However, as noted above, this sort of frequent, low-dose use of antibiotics only helps to encourage the development of drug-resistant pathogens.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Amazon Reportedly In Talks To Purchase Luxury Online Retailer Net-A-Porter


Amazon appears to be on the cusp of its largest purchase ever with the potential purchase of luxury online retailer Net-a-Porter.

Citing a person close to the matter, Forbes reports that negotiations for the potential $2.16 billion acquisition are still in the early stages.


A spokespeople for Amazon and Net-a-Porter didn’t return Forbes’ request for comment regarding the rumored purchase.


Amazon has a long history of high-dollar purchases. Last year, the company shelled out $1.1 billion for video game streaming company Twitch. Before that, in 2009, the e-retailer purchases online shoe retailer Zappos for $1.2 billion.


Forbes reports that Amazon’s previous pushes into the high-end retail world have largely fell flat, because consumer generally associate the online retailer with discounts and non-luxury brands.


Back in 2006, the company acquired Shopbop and retooled the site to focus on more designer brands. Then, in 2012, Amazon executives made a push for what they deemed a significant investment in luxury brands.


Amazon’s Purchase Of Luxury Retailer Net-a-Porter Far From Certain, But Talks On-Going [Forbes]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Consumerist Friday Flickr Finds

Here are eight of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last week, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.










Want to see your pictures on our site? Our Flickr Pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Deeper Learning: Ayuda a tu Clase a Conectar Ideas, Colaborar y Comunicarse





via Educación tecnológica http://ift.tt/1H4XdcT www.bscformacion.com

Primer encuentro de centros proyecto piloto Samsumg Smart School - INTEF





via Educación tecnológica http://ift.tt/1ICp7ht www.bscformacion.com