Internal Comcast Memo Says Consumerist Is All About “Headlines,” So Here’s One For Them


Earlier this month, Consumerist readers voted to hand Comcast its second Worst Company In America title, the results undoubtedly tied to the cable company’s ill-advised decision to acquire equally cruddy pay-TV provider Time Warner Cable. But rather than own up to — or even ignore — its WCIA tournament victory, the company chose to send out a memo to thousands of employees name-checking Consumerist and accusing us of being all about making headlines.

You can read the entire memo, written by Kevin Casey, President of Comcast’s Northeast Division, at the bottom of this post, but we’ll look specifically at some portions that stood out to us.


Here’s a paragraph in which Casey tells employees to blow off studies by groups that disprove of the merger and to listen to one particular study (but don’t look too closely because you’ll see just how badly the company is still doing):



We cannot make excuses for even one bad experience, but you should know that some of the more recent surveys were conducted by groups like Consumers Union, which have been actively lobbying against the proposed merger from the start. Others, like Consumerist, are designed more for media headlines than accuracy or insight. We have seen steady improvement on other large-scale, credible customer service surveys, including ones from the internationally-recognized J.D. Power & Associates, where since 2010, Comcast has improved more than any other provider in the industry, boosting overall TV satisfaction by 92 points and Internet satisfaction by 77 points.



Let’s break this paragraph down, shall we?

1. “[S]ome of the more recent surveys were conducted by groups like Consumers Union, which have been actively lobbying against the proposed merger from the start.”


We’re not going to speak for our colleagues at Consumers Union — which is the advocacy and public policy division of Consumer Reports — but we’re pretty sure that Casey is referring to CR’s annual telecom survey, which recently ranked Comcast and Time Warner as the worst-performing of the large cable companies (only one, minor, regional provider had a worse showing).


Thing is, while those survey results were made public in March, weeks after the merger, the actual national survey of more than 80,000 Consumer Reports readers was finished long before Comcast announced its intentions to merge with TWC.


Additionally, both Comcast and TWC have historically performed poorly in CR’s annual survey, so the recent results are no anomaly tied to a merger announcement that didn’t happen until after the survey was completed.


2. “Others, like Consumerist, are designed more for media headlines than accuracy or insight.”


This is a common complaint from companies involved in Worst Company voting, but one that is never really backed up with any evidence.


Consumerist is not ad-supported, so this notion that we run the WCIA tournament every year for pageview or visit spikes is a non-starter; there is no financial benefit to the site or to any of the staffers.


Where were all the big “media headlines” surrounding Comcast’s win? There were no TV or radio appearances made regarding this year’s tournament results, and only a handful of mentions in major online news outlets. Unlike Comcast, which blasts out press releases — presumably in the hopes of getting headlines — for every minor development at the company, we didn’t send out a release or make an announcement to the media about this year’s tournament.


We received significantly more media attention for previous WCIA wins by BP and EA; of course neither of those are the nation’s largest cable operator/ISP and operators one of its largest broadcasters and media networks.


We run the tournament because it’s a fun and interesting way to test the waters to see what’s ticking off consumers. If lots of people vote in or read about the WCIA tournament, the only benefit to us is the satisfaction in knowing that more people are discussing the topic. And if your company repeatedly makes the bracket, you’ve only your low customer satisfaction ratings to blame.


And Comcast should not throw stones when it comes time to question anyone’s commitment to truth and accuracy.


• This is a company that took advantage of decades of antiquated regional exclusivity deals to become a massive pay-TV and Internet provider with local monopolies in almost every market in which it operates, but whose CEO (and son of the company’s founder) now points to those same arrangements and complains that his only solution for expanding the company is to acquire another monstrous pay-TV player.


• This is a company that not only managed to shove a merger with NBC Universal down regulators’ throats, but then had the gall to almost immediately hire away one of the FCC commissioners that championed the deal and give her a job as a high-priced lobbyist.


• This is a company that repeatedly boasts that it is the only ISP that is guaranteed to oblige by the recently gutted net neutrality rules, while leaving out the little part about how Comcast is legally obliged to follow those guidelines through 2018 as part of its deal with regulators for approving the NBC merger.


• This is a company that has started testing data caps around the country, but refuses to use that term, instead calling them “data thresholds,” mostly because a cap would imply that you can’t go past that limit, while a threshold can be passed (and the customer can be charged extra).


And speaking of Comcast’s dedication to truthiness, let’s look at the final claim made in the above paragraph:


3. “We have seen steady improvement on other large-scale, credible customer service surveys, including ones from the internationally-recognized J.D. Power & Associates, where since 2010, Comcast has improved more than any other provider in the industry, boosting overall TV satisfaction by 92 points and Internet satisfaction by 77 points.”


Notice how Casey mentions “surveys” but only cites the J.D. Power results? Notice how he doesn’t link to those results or show how Comcast fared in relation to its competition? There’s a reason for that.


As we pointed out in our dissection of the New York Times’ misleading love letter to Comcast and CEO Roberts, Comcast may indeed have improved in the J.D. Power ratings, but it still has average or below-average scores across the board in every region.


Just check them out for yourself here and here.


In all seven categories, across all four regions, Comcast’s pay-TV service failed to score anything better than an “about average” rating from J.D. Power. The only companies to consistently fare as poorly or worse were Time Warner Cable and Charter, coincidentally the two companies that Comcast is currently in a menage a merge with.


Comcast’s Internet service performed slightly better, in that in one single category in one region it scored a high rating. All the other categories in all regions of the J.D. Power survey were “about average” or worse.


So this is like me bragging that I’ve improved by free-throw percentage by 25%, without telling you that my baseline free-throw shooting is so bad I might as well be tossing a medicine ball one-handed while blindfolded.


And Casey, like all his kin at Comcast, completely omits the work done by the American Customer Satisfaction Index, whose surveys put Comcast dead-last among ISPs and second only to TWC as the worst pay-TV provider.


Is Comcast actually the Worst Company In America? Consumerist voters said yes; that’s just as valid as a handful of foreign press reporters picking Golden Globe winners or silver-haired movie industry types selecting the Best Picture Oscar-winner.


If CR or Consumerist had done a survey that found Comcast to be among the best in its industry, you can bet that Casey and his fellow execs would be itching to use that to market their products (Thank god for a good No Commercial Use Policy).


But since we didn’t, the only thing they can do is try to discredit us. Better luck next time.


For those interested, below is the entire letter from Casey to the 24,000 Comcast staffers under his umbrella…



Dear Northeast Division Comcaster,


When we announced our intentions with Time Warner Cable on February 13, I asked you to work to stay focused on the tasks at hand, despite the inevitable distractions. I can’t be more proud of the laser-like focus you’ve demonstrated, and thanks to the teamwork, ownership and accountability of each and every one of you, we closed out a terrific first quarter of 2014 and met or exceeded virtually all our Northeast Division goals.


As you’ve no doubt realized, there’s a great deal of “noise” surrounding the Time Warner Cable deal, and this is only going to increase over the coming weeks and months as the review process continues. I am again asking you to remain focused on the day-to-day operations of running our business and on the areas we can each personally control – but I also want to acknowledge how difficult it can be to read negative stories about our Company in the press, to see things posted to social media, or to just hear friends and family commenting on reports they’ve seen or heard.


Criticism of any deal is normal, and I can assure you our government affairs and public relations teams across the Company are working around the clock to address inaccuracies and educate key audiences and stakeholders. It’s a reality that the bigger and more successful we are, the more we become a target for people and organizations with various special interests, sometimes unfairly, and we just need to have a “tougher skin.”


There is one area in particular, though, I want to address head-on with you, and that’s the recent coverage of our customer service. Every one of us has been working to improve our customers’ experiences and we have made significant progress reducing trouble calls and truck rolls; increasing first call resolution; ensuring on-time appointments; giving our customers more control over how they do business with us through self-service options; and improving overall customer satisfaction. We are continuing to make significant investments to transform the customer experience, and though we all know we are not yet where we want or need to be, we also can’t allow ourselves to get discouraged by surveys or polls that place us toward the bottom of customer rankings.


We cannot make excuses for even one bad experience, but you should know that some of the more recent surveys were conducted by groups like Consumers Union, which have been actively lobbying against the proposed merger from the start. Others, like Consumerist, are designed more for media headlines than accuracy or insight. We have seen steady improvement on other large-scale, credible customer service surveys, including ones from the internationally-recognized J.D. Power & Associates, where since 2010, Comcast has improved more than any other provider in the industry, boosting overall TV satisfaction by 92 points and Internet satisfaction by 77 points.


We are investing billions of dollars to transform the end-to-end customer experience through highly skilled and empowered employees, improved care and tech tools, self-service options like the recently launched My Account app, and innovation in our back office systems. In addition, we continue to invest in our network and in product innovations, the results of which are faster speeds, additional Cloud DVR markets, further X1 enhancements and much more over the coming weeks and months.


We have many things to feel good about this year, and I want to thank you for your passion and dedication. Let’s keep focused on the things we can control and I’m confident we’ll continue to make good progress toward our goals.


Regards,

Kevin Casey

President

Northeast Division





by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Walmart Wants To Cut 25% More Water From Laundry Detergents


While misleading directionsincorrect or misleading directions really don’t help, studies and real-life experience show that people tend to pour laundry detergent with a heavy hand. That’s why a new eco-friendly initiative from Walmart seems like a good thing, but will be really beneficial to detergent-makers.

Most people overdose on detergent–it’s not a nefarious plot or stupidity on consumers’ part; just how we are. Companies can count on selling us a little bit extra, and sales are actually falling slightly due to the growing popularity of pre-measured detergent pods. They might contain too much soap for a small load, but also remove entirely the ability to over-estimate the amount needed.


In this scenario, everyone wins. Walmart gets to stock its shelves with smaller bottles, giving them more shelf space to cram more merchandise on. They also get a little bit of enviromnental cred: using less plastic to move more detergent is a good thing. Consumers get to carry lighter bottles to their homes and/or cars, but there’s a disadvantage for us, too.


When detergent is more concentrated, that means that when we pour with a heavy hand, we use even more. The Wall Street Journal notes that overall detergent sales went up the last time major brands went through a “round of compaction” in 2008.


How Wal-Mart May Give Detergent Overdosing — And Sales — A Boost




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

El poder de YouTube para las marcas #infografia #infographic #marketing

Hola:


Una infografía sobre el poder de YouTube para las marcas. Vía


Un saludo


El poder de YouTube para las marcas

El poder de YouTube para las marcas





Archivado en: Infografía, Marketing on line, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Infografía, internet, Marketing, tic, Web 2.0.



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1u5YZp7

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Twitter y las marcas (1T/2014) #infografia #infographic #marketing #socialmedia

Hola:


Una infografía sobre Twitter y las marcas. Vía


Un saludo


Twitter y las marcas

Twitter y las marcas





Archivado en: Infografía, Marketing on line, Redes Sociales, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Infografía, internet, Marketing, redes sociales, tic, Web 2.0.



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1hf1Pzg

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Españoles por el Mundo #infografia #infographic

Hola:


Una infografía sobre los Españoles por el Mundo. Vía


Un saludo


Españoles por el Mundo

Españoles por el Mundo





Archivado en: Economía, España, Infografía Tagged: Economía, Infografía



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1pPRhjg

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Report: Debt Collectors Now Using Court System To Unfairly Force Consumers To Pay Up


Debt collection is a big business that doesn’t look to be shrinking anytime soon. But along with the rapid expansion of the industry, there has been an increase in abusive and predatory collection practices. One of those practices, obtaining default judgements against consumers, has led the Center for Responsible Lending to call for stricter regulations over the process of selling debt to collectors.

A new report [PDF] from the Center for Responsible Lending highlights how a lack of regulations over the debt buying and collection industries has become a billion dollar business while financially devastated consumers.


Nearly one in seven Americans are currently being pursued by a debt collector, but most of the debts being sought aren’t even owed. How can collectors be hounding consumer for debts that simply don’t exist anymore?


The situation occurs when a collector buys a debt from the original issuer, generally a bank, at rock-bottom prices. The purchaser then receives limited or inaccurate information about the consumer’s debt; often only a name, last known address and purported amount owed. In fact, in 2009 only 6% of debts purchased came with any documentation.


info


But a lack of information doesn’t stop collectors from making attempts to acquire payments from consumers. And that, according to consumer complaints received by the Federal Trade Commission, is when predatory and abusive practices begin. Complaints filed by consumers include the use of harassing phone calls, threats of arrest, obscene or abusive language, and unlawful threats to sue when attempts to collect are made.


When these, often illegal, tactics don’t work collectors more frequently turn to the justice system to sue consumers for their debts. Collectors then obtain default judgement in their favor when the consumer does not appear in court. CRL reports that consumers generally fail to show because they never received notice of the lawsuit, can’t afford legal representation, or simply don’t understand the need to appear.


Pursuing default judgements is becoming the norm for debt collectors. The report found that in 2011 nearly 80% of all default judgements in New York state were in debt-collection cases. In Minnesota, an estimated 2,400 default judgements were made per month in 2007. That same year, 60,699 cases out of 130,000 cases filed in Cook County, IL, were default judgements.


court


By receiving a default judgement, the collector can legally freeze a consumer’s bank account, garnish wages, report the judgement to a credit reporting agency, and pressure a consumer into a payment plan. In some states, collectors can even have a consumer arrested for lack of payment or seize personal property to satisfy the judgement.


Not surprisingly, the CRL report found that minorities, senior citizens and low- and middle-income communities experience a higher rate of debt buyer lawsuits and abuses.


Small-claims courts, that are often faced with hearing these cases, have been overwhelmed by the debt collection industry. Generally, these courts are not equipped to deal with the volume of cases and, as a result, are not run inefficiently. CRL found that cases aren’t given the attention they need, judges stubble to adequately handle all the cases and consumers are sometimes pressured into settlements.


CRL proposes that firmer oversight at both the federal and state level would ensure that debt collection happens fairly and responsibly. Recommendations include:



  • Holding banks responsible for the debts they sell – Banks should be required to repurchase accounts that are not collectible due to insufficient documentation, be held accountable for their own practices, and retain liability for the debts they sell.

  • Require banks to conduct more oversight of the debt sales process and of the debt buyers to whom they sell – Banking regulators should establish rules and guidance on the policies and practices that banks must follow if they are going to sell debt.

  • Regulate the flow of information in the debt-collection market – Federal regulators should require increased and accurate documentation and information for each debt sold at the time of sale.

  • Prohibit the initiation of collection efforts on any debt unless the debt buyer has the information necessary to substantiate and verify the debt being sought.

  • Prohibit the sale, collection of, and lawsuits on time-barred debt.

  • Prohibit the sale of certain accounts.

  • Clarify and improve available remedies for harmed consumers.


Tighter regulations could be forthcoming from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.


In January 2013 , the Bureau’s larger participant rule for debt collection went into effect. Under the rule, the Bureau has supervisory authority over any firm with more than $10 million in annual receipts from consumer debt collection.


In November, the CFPB created the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the first step toward considering consumer protection rules for the debt collection market.


While ANPR is an adequate start, consumer advocates say more can be done to ensure consumer protection.


Our colleagues at Consumers Union continue to urge the Bureau to write rules that achieve: sensible regulations that apply to all persons collecting debt and strong federal standards for information flow and verification procedures.


“The debt collection system has been long overdue for a comprehensive overhaul, to address current market realities and provide meaningful protections to consumers,” officials with Consumers Union posted on its DefendYourDollars blog last month. “By writing strong rules of the road at the federal level, the Bureau can help ensure that consumers across the country have basic important protections against improper collection practices.”


Debt Buyers Found to Routinely Scam Courts to Pursue Debts [Center for Responsible Lending]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Complaint Asks Library To Remove ‘Hop On Pop’ Because It Promotes Violence Against Dads

But don't.

But don’t.



When you’ve got a system that allows the general public to air grievances, it’s pretty much guaranteed that there will be some off-the-wall issues. Or at least, problems that seem to not be all that serious: the Toronto Public Library received a complaint asking for librarians to remove Dr. Seuss’ Hop On Pop, claiming that it promotes violence against well, pops, dear old dad, father dearest. You get it.

That being said, we are very pro-pops here at Consumerist, pro-parent, really, and would never want any dad to be harmed as a result of reading Hop On Pop.


Moving along — yes, this is a real(ish) issue, according to a document the library posted online with seven books that the library was asked to remove over the year (via UPI).


The complaint says the 1963 Seuss favorite “encourages children to use violence against their fathers,” according to the complaint.


Whoever wrote it asked that the library should apologize to Toronto fathers and pay for any damages resulting from the book.


That being said, the Materials Review Committee has made the decision to keep the book in the children’s collection, saying that it’s “humorous,” “well-loved” and that it has “appeared on many ‘Best of’ children’s book lists.”


And besides, anyone who’s actually read Hop On Pop instead of rushing to make a frivolous complaint and waste everyone’s time would know, at the end, the book tells kids not to actually jump on dad. A very important life lesson.


Toronto library asked to shelve Dr. Seuss’ ‘Hop on Pop’ because it promotes violence [UPI]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Guía de diseño para el nuevo Twitter #infografia #infographic #socialmedia

Hola:


Una infografía con una Guía de diseño para el nuevo Twitter. Vía


Un saludo


Guía de diseño para el nuevo Twitter

Guía de diseño para el nuevo Twitter





Archivado en: Infografía, Redes Sociales, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Infografía, internet, redes sociales, tic, Twitter, Web 2.0.



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1hTQmZC

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

El muestreo de Google Analytics #infografia #infographic #seo

Hola:


Una infografía sobre el muestreo de Google Analytics. Vía


Un saludo


El muestreo de Google Analytics

El muestreo de Google Analytics





Archivado en: Infografía, Posicionamiento Web, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Google, Infografía, internet, tic



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1n3UzuV

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com