3 Reasons Why Yelp Should Reconsider Its “Elite” Yelper Program

Nine years ago, online review site Yelp began bestowing “Elite” status upon certain reviewers, rewarding them — sometimes literally, with free swag — for their frequent write-ups and their dedication to the site. While it’s arguably a positive thing for Yelp to recognize certain users, it may be time for the site to reconsider how it runs the whole Elite program.


Over the weekend, the San Francisco Chronicle had this story on Elite Yelpers and the perks that come with their mysteriously earned status.


After some discussion in the Consumerist Fortress of Solitude, we arrived the following four ways in which Elite status is problematic.


1. It Confuses Quantity With Quality


Or at least we think it does. No one actually knows, as the selection process for becoming an Elite Yelper is shrouded in mystery, with the site listing the hard-to-quantify metrics of “Authenticity, Contribution, and Connection” as determining factors.


It might as well be the subject of a Dan Brown novel.


But one thing that appears to be common among Elites is a high volume of output.


One Elite spotlighted in the Chronicle piece has been averaging nearly one review per day over the course of the last eight years. He apparently has the cash to dine out four times a week, which allows him to keep up this volume.


We’re not going to slight this reviewer or say that he doesn’t deserve Elite status. In fact, we applaud his desire to share his opinions with Yelp users and wish we could afford to eat out as frequently.


Our concern — especially since Yelp refuses to explain the selection process in detail — is that looking at a user’s volume of reviews may exclude less-frequent Yelpers whose opinions are just as valid and may be just as thoughtful.


Elite status can also be taken away at the end of the year. Does that mean that the opinions of a former Elite are no longer as worth of consideration because she’s lost that Elite tag?


Additionally, dangling the Elite carrot before users and hinting that posting lots of reviews is key to earning the coveted status may lead some Yelpers to write reviews just for the sake of writing reviews. Not every meal at every restaurant — nor every visit to a dry cleaner, barber, hardware store, or nail salon — merits a write-up.


2. It Bestows Semi-Celebrity Status On Customers


In addition to the free swag that Yelp throws at Elite Yelpers to thank them, the site also convinces local businesses to host parties for Elites — some parties for just certain tiers of Elites.


“I’m finally now a Gold Elite, and certain parties are only for us,” one Elite tells the Chronicle. “It makes me feel like a VIP celebrity of San Francisco.”


But by rewarding Elites with gifts and parties — and threatening that Elite status can be taken away — Yelp is effectively using these reviewers as low-paid employees.


This is not like YouTube, where people with popular channels can make a living selling ads and sponsorship against their videos. These Yelpers are expected to keep writing at a fevered pace in exchange for status, which is affirmed by the aforementioned parties.


Yelpers are not supposed to write reviews based on what happens at these parties, but they are allowed to go back to these businesses as customers and write reviews.


While those subsequent reviews may be perfectly objective, the mere fact that Yelp are setting up its highest-profile reviewers to party with the very businesses they are supposed to review is enough to give Yelp critics — and there are plenty of them — reason to question the site’s reviews.


And this isn’t anything new. Several years ago, business-owners in Chicago accused Yelp of offering to rearrange user reviews on their Yelp pages if they sponsored one of these parties for Elites, though Yelp labeled the whole thing a misunderstanding.


3. It Creates Monsters, Real & Imaginary


Yelp rules discourage Elite users from leveraging their status to get better stuff. Yet there are reports of Elite Yelpers telling restaurants of their status in advance, and a few incidents of supposed Elites demanding better service or free food.


There was also that 2011 feeding frenzy at one of those Elite parties, where Yelp had to remind Elites to not be a-holes.


Surely not every person who tells a waiter “Be nice to me; I’m an Elite” — we wouldn’t be surprised if most of those cases are people who don’t even have Yelp profiles but just use the vague threat of a negative Elite review to see what they can get.


But it’s not like being an Elite comes with a badge or an ID card, so anyone can claim they have it when sitting down for a meal. And while an Elite could lose his status for making such a demand, it’s not like the restaurant will know his name, especially if someone else pays or he pays in cash.


The vast majority of Elite Yelpers are perfectly good people who would never pull such shenanigans, but the ease with which one can claim to be an Elite — and the risk faced by a restaurant for mistreating an Elite — is enough to merit a reconsideration of the status.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Coffee-Flavored Doughnuts Now Available At Dunkin’ Donuts

Dunkin-Donuts-CoverEarlier this year, Krispy Kreme stuffed doughnuts with mocha filling and drizzled coffee flavoring on top. If that sounds delicious, well, too bad: they’re no longer on the menu, replaced with more summery banana creme and carrot cake flavors. Don’t worry, though: coffee-and-pastry competitor Dunkin’ Donuts is here to save us all with doughnuts that don’t have to be dunked to taste like coffee.


The two limited-time offerings are similar, except for their exterior coatings. Both are yeast doughnuts filled with coffee-flavored buttercream. The Coffee Creme version is glazed with a coffee-flavored frosting drizzle on the outside. The Coffee, Creme & Sugar Donut has, well, powdered sugar on the outside.


In other pastry news, Cinnabon is wasting perfectly good stomach space on fresh fruit toppings. Come on, Cinnabon: don’t you know that fruit is out to kill us all? Even frozen fruit drenched in syrup.


Dunkin’ Donuts Unveils First-Ever Coffee Flavored Donuts [Foodbeast]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

FAA: Pilot Endangered People By Buzzing His House, The Mall At 500 Feet


Seeing your world down on Earth in miniature is something we humans have enjoyed ever since the first person got to the top of something tall, looked down and said “Oooh, that’s my cave all the way down there!” But the Federal Aviation Administration says one pilot flying a US Airways passenger flight should’ve resisted that urge when he reportedly buzzed his house and a local mall at an altitude of only 500 feet.


In a probe by the FAA into the incident, officials say the pilot-in-command of a flight carrying 24 passengers and two crew members purposely flew the US Airways flight dangerously low over his house and a local mall, which was open late during the holiday season in December 2012, reports USA Today.


“My brain went into emergency/evacuation mode,” a flight attendant told FAA officials during an interview, remembering when she looked out the window and saw how low the plane was as it was heading toward the Salisbury-Ocean City: Wicomico Regional Airport in Maryland. The plane landed safely, with passengers seemingly none the wiser.


In documents uncovered by The Daily Times of Salisbury under the the Freedom of Information Act, the FAA said the plane was operated with “reckless disregard for safety … at an excessive speed and dangerously low altitude when not necessary for landing.”


It determined that the pilot’s actions “endangered the lives of your passengers, fellow crewmembers and people and property” at the mall, demonstrating that “you are unable or unwilling to comply with basic regulatory requirements.”


The pilot in question had his airline transport pilot certificate revoked under an emergency order by the FAA on June 19, 2013, with allegations that he violated federal aviation regulations, including flying an aircraft over a “congested area” below 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle.


A spokeswoman for Piedmont Airlines, which operated that flight, said that day was the last in the air for the pilot with the company, and he doesn’t work there anymore.


The plane was reportedly at about 500 feet above the mall during the move, which was much lower than the 1,500 feet his first officer said he usually pulled the move at, which even had a nickname.


He’d been on the job with Piedmont about nine months, and said “everyone knows” about the buzz move, according to his FAA interview.


“[The pilot]… likes to fly over his house on the way into Salisbury. I hear he usually does it at 1,500 feet but I hear that on the 21st he did it at around 400 feet,” he reportedly told the FAA. “Man, that’s crazy being that low, and over the mall, all those people. That’s like the busiest day of the year for shopping there.”


Crazy indeed, man.


FAA probe shows pilot buzzed mall, home at 500 feet [USA Today]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Contenido visual: el futuro del Social Media #infogafia #infographic #socialmedia

Hola:


Una infografía sobre Contenido visual: el futuro del Social Media. Vía


Un saludo


Contenido visual: el futuro del Social Media

Contenido visual: el futuro del Social Media





Archivado en: Infografía, Redes Sociales, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Infografía, internet, redes sociales, tic, Web 2.0.



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/UOiuVJ

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Woman Notices Security Camera Pointed At Thrift Store Dressing Room, Freaks Out

cameraImagine that you were trying on clothes in the dressing room of a store, and you happened to glimpse a security camera pointed right at you. What would you do? When this happened to one shopper at a thrift store in Missouri, she whipped out her own camera and captured its image to show to a local TV station.


The camera, it turns out, is not zoomed in to allow store management to spy on people trying on clothes. Both the news reporters and the woman who originally reported the problem watched the camera feed, noting that it provided an overview of the store, not a close-up on the changing room. Anyone in the dressing room was severely pixelated, but still visible.


redracks


“I was actually able to see a lady changing,” the woman who originally reported the camera told KTVI news. “I could see her standing there in her red bra from the waist up.”


Police checked out the camera feed, and they didn’t notice anything illegal or untoward. Like nearly all store surveillance cameras, they’re intended to deter shoplifting, not to spy on shoppers. Other thrift stores in the same chain, Red Racks, don’t have their cameras pointed toward the dressing rooms.


The store’s manager has changed the angle of the camera, but wouldn’t confirm to KTVI why it was moved.


Security cameras near dressing rooms shock customer [KTVI]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

LinkedIn Must Pay Employees $6M For Unpaid Overtime

inked in What happens when a company built on human resources and professional networking doesn’t act so professional? In the case of LinkedIn, the business is ordered to pay employees $6 million for unpaid overtime and damages.


The U.S. Department of Labor announced today that LinkedIn agreed to pay $3.3 million in overtime back wages and $2.5 million in liquidated damages to 359 former and current employees in California, Illinois, Nebraska and New York for violating the overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).


According to investigators with the Wage and Hour Division of the Dept. of Labor, LinkedIn failed to record, account and pay for all hours worked in a workweek.


FLSA requires that covered, nonexempt employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular hourly rates for hours worked beyond 40 per week.


In addition to paying the back wages and damages, LinkedIn agreed to enter an enhanced compliance agreement with the Dept. that states the company will: provide compliance training and distribute its policy prohibiting off-the-clock work to all nonexempt employees and their managers; meet with managers of current affected employees to remind them that overtime work must be recorded and paid for; and remind employees of LinkedIn’s policy prohibiting retaliation against any employee who raises concerns about workplace issues.


A spokesperson from LinkedIn told Business Insider that the issue stems from “not having the right tools in place for some employees and their managers to track hours properly; prior to the DoL approaching us, we had already begun to remedy this. LinkedIn has made every effort possible to ensure each impacted employee has been made whole.”


LinkedIn to pay nearly $6M in unpaid overtime wages and damages to 359 employees following US Labor Department investigation [Dept. of Labor]


US Government: LinkedIn Needs To Pay $6 Million In Overtime To Hundreds Of Employees [Business Insider]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

Conectados hasta en el baño #infografia #infographic #internet

Hola:


Una infografía sobre: Conectados hasta en el baño.


Un saludo


Conectados hasta en el baño

Conectados hasta en el baño





Archivado en: Infografía, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Infografía, internet, Telefonía, tic



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1mgqmGE

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Web móvil: Android supera a Apple #infografia #infographic #apple

Hola:


Una infografía sobre Web móvil: Android supera a Apple.


Un saludo


Infographic: Mobile Web: Android Surpasses Apple | Statista

You will find more statistics at Statista




Archivado en: Infografía, Sociedad de la información Tagged: Android, Apple, Infografía, internet, Telefonía, tic



from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1qNAlWM

via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Feds Subpoena GM Over Subprime Auto Loans


After recalling more than 30 million cars and facing a number of investigations, it’s probably safe to bet that General Motors Company would like to put 2014 in the rearview mirror. Before that’s possible the company will have to get through five more months and a new federal investigation into its financing unit regarding subprime auto loans.


According to Reuters, the Dept. of Justice issued subpoenas to GM regarding an investigation into the company’s possible violation of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), which prohibits the making of false statements to federally insured financial institutions.


The DOJ has used FIRREA to go after Wells Fargo for allegedly tricking the Federal Housing Authority into insuring toxic loans, and Bank of America for selling worthless loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


The subpoena directs GM to turn over documents related to the underwriting criteria it used to make subprime auto loans since 2007, as well as, information about the representations GM made about the criteria when the loans were pooled into securities.


Reuters reports that while regulators have brought recent cases against auto lenders for allegations of discrimination, GM’s subpoena could be the first public acknowledgment by investigators into the securitization of subprime auto loans.


Last December, Ally Financial Inc, GM’s former financing unit, resolved Justice Dept. claims that it charged minorities higher interest rates than other borrowers by agreeing to pay $98 million.


GM unit gets subpoena over subprime auto loans [Chicago Tribune]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

McDonald’s Franchisee: Company Told Me To Pay Employees Less


McDonald’s, the largest fast food employer in the country, is at the center of the ongoing debate about minimum wage levels, and about the relationship between franchisees and their corporate overlords. One owner of a McDonald’s franchise in California says the folks at McDonald’s HQ have an answer for franchisees who complain about paper-thin profit margins on their food — pay employees less money.

In a “First Person” piece posted in today’s Washington Post, the franchisee says smaller operators like her family — they only own a single franchise after McDonald’s did not renew their other store — are being squeezed by the corporate office’s demand for bottom-dollar prices on menu items.


“We try and accommodate our workers, but there’s several issues,” she writes. “The way McDonald’s does it, they work to bring customers into the stores with their very low prices. So the difference for us between a dollar hamburger and a $3 hamburger is huge.”


She says that she complained to McDonald’s years ago that it needs to get away from pushing low-value, low-profit sandwiched, but that the company’s response was “Just pay your employees less.”


The franchisee admits that the low-price stuff does get bodies in the door, but claims that recent pricing changes have taken away her ability to make money on the higher-priced items.


“[I]nstead of sticking with low-price stuff at one level and giving people an opportunity to go up if they wanted a bigger drink to pay more, now we’ve got all size drinks are a dollar,” she writes. “So McDonald’s has gotten itself in a trap. And as an owner operator, and if you don’t do their dollar sandwiches or other discounts, you get punished.”


According to the franchisee, she believes McDonald’s is trying to rid itself of smaller operators like her and her family in favor of mega-franchisees who run dozens of locations.


“Now there are franchisees with 50, 60 restaurants,” she writes. “The way that McDonald’s works is, you pay them rent for the building and the land, and it’s a triple net lease. Plus you pay them for advertising and promotion and PR. Then you pay the bills and what’s left at the bottom is what the owner operator gets.”


And she clarifies that “This is not just a McDonald’s problem,” that this squeeze play is a “standard thing” in fast food industry.


A 2013 survey of McDonald’s franchisees found a growing level of discontent among the franchise owners, as McDonald’s HQ was asking them to improve service and offer new menu items while also continuing to sell value-priced food.


And McDonald’s HQ then screwed up by forcing franchisees to try to sell chicken wings at a price that was significantly higher than people can get at their local sports bar.


Because McDonald’s corporate office gets so much in return and exerts so much influence over franchisees’ businesses, the National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel recently declared that franchisees and McDonald’s HQ should be considered “joint employers,” meaning the corporate office could be held responsible for franchisees who violate labor laws.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist