Police Seek Woman Who Stuffed $1,140 In Electronics Inside Her Skirt

criminalcrinolineA dress with a flowing full skirt is a great fashion choice for a hot day, so the woman who walked into a RadioShack in Florida dressed that way back in February didn’t really stand out. No one really noticed the full skirt of her floral dress…not even when she and her shopping companion began cramming electronics under the skirt, into some kind of criminal crinoline with pockets.

This was after RadioShack declared bankruptcy but before they closed more than half of their stores, but that’s still no excuse. You can watch the video over at the Sun-Sentinel web site: it auto-plays, so we won’t embed it here.

What is the woman stuffing inside her dress? Police say that she took fairly common RadioShack items off the shelves, which included remote-controlled toys, an electronic music kit, and automated appliances. They didn’t name the specific items, but it must have cleaned off a shelf: RadioShack employees only noticed that a theft had occurred when they saw the empty space on the shelf.

If you happen to know who this couple are, let Broward Crime Stoppers know: you can call in anonymous tips at 954-493-8477. If you happen to know how to make an under-the-skirt storage device like this, you should probably patent it.

Up-the-skirt shoplifter swipes electronics at Weston store [Sun-Sentinel]


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana #infografia #infographic

Hola: Una infografía con 10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana. Vía Un saludo

TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1daU0iL Via Alfredo Vela y www.bscformacion.com

10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana #infografia #infographic

Hola:

Una infografía con 10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana. Vía

Un saludo

10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana

10 libros imprescindibles para la lengua castellana


Archivado en: Infografía Tagged: Infografía

from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1PwvlD8
via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Gestión de la emociones en el aula en los nuevos entornos educativos #education

Hola:

Una presentación sobre la Gestión de la emociones en el aula en los nuevos entornos educativos.

Un saludo


Archivado en: Formación Tagged: formación

from TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1PwqeD5
via Alfredo Vela Posteado por www.bscformacion.com

Gestión de la emociones en el aula en los nuevos entornos educativos #education

Hola: Una presentación sobre la Gestión de la emociones en el aula en los nuevos entornos educativos. Un saludo

TICs y Formación http://ift.tt/1Ggjanj Via Alfredo Vela y www.bscformacion.com

That Was Fast: Charter Reportedly Already Reaching Out To TWC About Possible Merger

timecharterlogoToday’s headlines are all about Comcast failing to buy Time Warner Cable, but there weren’t just two players in the game. Another company is losing out: Charter would have been the lucky recipient of all the mega-merger’s spun-off customers, giving them greater consolidation over markets mainly in the midwest. But with the failure of the mega-merger, TWC is now minus one new owner, and Charter is minus all those new paying customers. So if a new deal i already in the works, well, color us unsurprised.

Bloomberg Business — which also was the first to hear on Thursday that Comcast was about to bail on the TWC deal — reports this afternoon that Charter has already reached out to spurned suitor Time Warner Cable about another possible union.

Charter already made one go at buying TWC, but got shot down in January in favor of the more lucrative offer from Comcast. As the Comcast/TWC approval process dragged on with federal regulators, Charter made it clear they’d be happy to try again should the opportunity present itself. And now it has.

Charter’s 2013/2014 offer to TWC was about $31 billion; Comcast’s failed bid was $45 billion.

According to Bloomberg, executives from the two companies have not yet sat down to negotiate any specific details, but Charter has already approached banks about potential financing and “advisers” for the company were reaching out to people at Time Warner Cable earlier today.

Charter’s planned acquisition of Florida-centric Bright House Networks is also on the line after the collapse of the Comcast/TWC merger, and could be part of any further merger deals.

As for the regulatory angle, a merged Charter/TWC would have one big advantage over anything involving Comcast, and that’s size. Or rather, the lack thereof. Put together, TWC and Charter still have fewer subscribers than Comcast alone, and would only add to TWC’s status as the second-largest cable company in America.

Charter Advisers Said to Contact Time Warner Cable for Talks [Bloomberg]


by Kate Cox via Consumerist

Eyewear Maker Luxottica Says The New Version Of Google Glass Is On Its Way

Out with the old, in with the new.

Out with the old, in with the new.

For those who didn’t get a chance/didn’t want to jump on the Google Glass bandwagon the first time it rolled around, with its oft-maligned design that allows people to record everything they’re seeing (including people who might not want to be filmed), you’ll soon have the opportunity to get/make fun of/criticize a new version soon.

Luxottica, the Italian eyewear company behind brands like Ray-Ban and Oakley that teamed up with Google in an effort to make Glass something people will actually want to wear, says we should expect the newest offering soon, with CEO Massimo Vian telling shareholders at the company’s general meeting in Milan, Italy that preparations for the new Glass design are underway, reports the Wall Street Journal.

Though Vian didn’t share any details about exactly when it’ll launch or what capabilities it will have — for example, will wearers still be able to snap photos or record video of unsuspecting parties without tipping them off? — but reportedly said it will be out soon.

“In Google, there are some second thoughts on how to interpret version 3 [of the eyewear],” Vian told shareholders. “What you saw was version 1. We’re now working on version 2, which is in preparation.”

Google stopped selling Glass earlier this year and shuttered its Explorer program amid low sales, which made some tongues wag over what some saw as the demise of the project. Despite that, Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt insisted it wasn’t done yet, telling the WSJ it had been moved into the same division as Google Nest, “to make it ready for users.”

Google declined to comment on specifics of the new version, saying only in a statement: “The team is heads down building the future of the product and we’re not commenting on rumor or speculation.”

Italian Eyewear Maker Luxottica Working on New Version of Google Glass, CEO Says [Wall Street Journal]


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

How A 90-Minute Presentation Turned Into A 2-Year Timeshare Nightmare

Not even once. (Misfit Photographer)

Not even once. (Misfit Photographer)

Most Consumerist readers consider themselves savvy and resistant to marketing messages and sales pitches. Even then, be cautious when accepting free stuff or cash in exchange for sitting through a time-share presentation. One couple received such an offer while shopping in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. They say that they were offered $450 to attend a 90-minute presentation, and after 8 hours of sales pitches signed up for a timeshare that they didn’t want.

How does that happen? CBS Sacramento investigated what’s been going on at this resort, and found plenty of people who claim that they were plied with alcohol on an empty stomach during the course of the sales pitch. Some claim to have been drugged. A former employee explained that this was a common practice: they would bring in a nice glass of wine or a cold can of beer after prospects had been sitting there for hours with nothing to drink. “After four hours of not drinking, not eating, half a beer you start to feel buzzed,” he explained to CBS Sacramento.

The couple say that the salespeople opened up new credit cards for them, charging the down payment and closing costs for their condo to the new accounts. They sought assistance from Mexico’s consumer protection agency, and were able to hand them a cancellation letter within the five-day period that timeshare buyers have to change their minds. They returned home to collection calls. That was back in 2013, and the cancellation was never fully canceled. They did get their refund, but only after a reporter and camera crew flew down to Mexico and intervened on their behalf two years later.

One thing to keep in mind if you do decide to buy a time-share is that there’s a cooling-off period. The salespeople won’t push this idea on you, of course, but that’s the case in Mexico and when you buy any kind of timeshare here in the United States, too. If you go home to sleep on it and change your mind, you are able to back out of the transaction.

Call Kurtis Investigates: Mexican Timeshare Nightmare


by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Showtime May Soon Announce Standalone Streaming Service

happyishBack in Nov. 2014, CBS CEO Les Moonves said that his company’s Showtime network would “fairly definitively” launch some sort of standalone streaming service in 2015. Since then, there hasn’t really been much news about it. But since HBO has launched HBO Now without the world coming to an end, it looks like it might be time for CBS to unveil that service.

The Street reports that CBS may announce a standalone Showtime product when the media giant announces its next earnings report in early May.

The network is reportedly talking to possible distribution partners to sell the service directly to consumers.

It could go with Apple, who currently has a near-exclusive with HBO for HBO Now (the only other seller for the service is Cablevision, which is limited to customers with its Optimum broadband service).

Showtime could also go with Dish or Sony, both of which recently launched their own live-TV streaming services.

Dish’s Sling already sells something similar to HBO Now, but it’s different in two important ways. First, unlike HBO Now, HBO on Sling offers both live and on-demand access to the network; HBO Now is solely on-demand in its current form. Second, in order to get HBO from Sling, you need to also have the Sling $20/month base package. HBO Now is a true standalone service in that you only need an Internet connection.

Adding Showtime as a premium stream on Sling might make better sense than Sony’s PlayStation Vue, which is currently only available in three markets — New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago. However, Vue does carry some CBS-owned channels, while Dish and CBS have had some very public feuds; though that tense relationship appeared more at ease after the two companies’ last contract renewal.

Interestingly, Showtime’s current on-demand app, Showtime Anytime, offers users the ability to stream the network live to your mobile devices. If the network ports that functionality over to a standalone service, that might make it even more appealing.

CBS would likely try to sell Showtime at the same $15/month price point as HBO Now, though the show doesn’t currently have any single piece of original content that compares to HBO’s Game of Thrones juggernaut.

As you can see from the below screengrab, CBS recently applied for a trademark on “Showtime 3,” for a product described as “Broadcasting services, namely transmitting and streaming digital audio, video, graphics, text and data, rendered through the media of telelvision, cable, satellite, radio, telephone and broadband systems, and via the internet, portable and wireless communications devices.”

showtime3

This could just be another channel that Showtime is adding to its lineup of sub-networks. There is already a Showtime 2, but the network has eschewed numbers in subsequent offerings, choosing instead things like Showtime Beyond, Showtime Extreme, Showtime Family Zone, Showtime Next, and Showtime Women.


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Comcast Can’t Buy TWC, But There Are Plenty Of Other Companies They Can Spend $45B On

Comcast’s dream of achieving full coast-to-coast cable dominance this year came to an official end this morning when they had to admit the Time Warner Cable merger was just not going to happen. But Comcast is a huge business, with impatient shareholders. They need to continue proving growth, which means buying other businesses to make theirs bigger. TWC might not be on the table anymore, but something, somewhere has to be.

So with $45 billion just burning a hole in their pocket, what can Comcast spend it on? Here are some strategies they might try.

Go Wireless
Comcast was wrong when they claimed mobile data was real competition for cable — but they were on the right track. The wireless sector is growing, the tech is improving, and mobile looks in basically every way to be the wave of the future. There are reasons that AT&T and DirecTV want to merge: bringing wireless service in-house with pay-TV and broadband service looks like a really good bet for the next decade or two of the 21st century.

AT&T and Verizon are complete non-starters for a merger (aside from the huge competition issues, both companies are worth billions more than Comcast is), but Sprint or T-Mobile could be on the table. Sprint’s parent company isn’t necessarily looking to sell right now, but T-Mobile’s has been trying to find a buyer for months. And at a cool $28 billion market cap, T-Mo would be a steal for Comcast.

Since wireless is the one pie Comcast doesn’t currently seem to have a thumb in, that could go better for them than the TWC proposal did. Though they’d still be in the awkward position of arguing that all that wireless competition they claimed existed when they wanted to buy TWC suddenly doesn’t actually compete with cable internet after all.

Streaming Video
Comcast already owns anything in the NBC Universal family, and with that came a 33% stake in Hulu. But even though Hulu keeps chugging along, it’s not the big name in the streaming business. The elephant in that room is clearly Netflix.

Right now, Netflix is valued at just shy of $34 billion. Comcast has the money… if they could make the case.

Analysts have suggested that Comcast might actually try for it. That would make them hugely competitive in the streaming space, as traditional pay-TV subscriptions decline — but it would have to come with an utterly enormous pile of stipulations to make it through the FCC.

Comcast repeatedly pointed to Netflix (along with Amazon and Facebook) as competition in their regulatory filings for the failed TWC transaction. And it is, in many senses. They’d have to lay out one heck of a compelling case to explain why they were wrong in that transaction in order for a Netflix buyout to pass muster as not being anticompetitive.

Digital Media
Comcast already owns a major broadcast TV network, several cable networks, and a movie studio, thanks to their 2011 acquisition of NBCUniversal. But if the future of news is online and not on the air, why would they stop there?

Indeed, sources say that Comcast has been eyeing one of the foremost of the current wave of new media start-up brands: Vox Media, home to SB Nation, Polygon, The Verge and, well, Vox (among others).

Comcast’s venture capital company is already one of Vox’s investors. And according to Fortune, the two companies were in talks earlier this year that fizzled out. The $300 – $400 million Vox is valued at is basically pocket change in Kabletown. Now that Comcast doesn’t have a mega-merger on its plate this spring, that could free up time and money for them to try again.

Bandwidth Barons
During the net neutrality debates, we heard a lot about Comcast being a “last mile” provider, moving traffic from trunk carriers, as it were, over the shorter distances to your house. That’s where all the peering and interconnection disputes came into it.

Comcast could short-circuit some of their peering agreements (at either end) pretty much forever if they owned the next chain in the link, too.

Level 3 has a market cap of $19 billion, give or take. Cogent’s about $1.6 billion. Comcast could afford either — if it would be allowed to buy them. The Antitrust Division might have a thing or two to say about Comcast buying out the backbone, which everyone uses, and not just the last mile. That said, other major Tier 1 ISPs already do include AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint so it might not be so farfetched after all.

International Roaming
Pay-TV penetration in the U.S. probably peaked in the last couple of years, and is going to be on a gentle downhill slide. But there are 195 other nations in the world and Comcast could acquire TV and possibly broadband operators overseas.

Highly-regulated European nations are unlikely to welcome a broadband intrusion from America’s perennial Worst Company, but there are plenty of other places in the world where infrastructure can be built out for pennies on the dollar as compared to within the U.S. If Comcast bought a local provider elsewhere, and targeted the right place, they could theoretically have an in to as captive a broadband-craving audience as they do here.

Smaller Cable Companies
Comcast got to be Comcast because of consolidation. Cable companies used to be hyper-local, serving just a few municipalities or counties. Then small companies started merging, and kept merging, until they became very large companies — which still snapped up tiny ones.

Regulators rightly decided that merging the #1 and #2 cable operators was a bridge too far, but they might be less hostile to Comcast buying small, regional or local providers. Adding 12,000 subscribers here and there doesn’t have quite the same level of national impact that adding 12 million would have.

Targets in the top ten might not pass muster with the FCC, but Comcast could target companies in the next rung down, like WOW or Cable One. The companies are privately-owned so it’s hard to know exactly what they’re valued at, but either (or even both together) would be a fraction of the cost of acquiring TWC.

And if that doesn’t work…
$45 billion is just about enough money to buy 7 billion burritos. If all else fails, Comcast could buy everyone on Earth a nice, hearty lunch. That, at least, might win them some goodwill.


by Kate Cox via Consumerist